ArticleMedicine2017
Case report repairing orbital skin defects using composite flaps after giant eyelid-derived tumor excision and orbital exenteration.
Article in Medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- A massive ocular surface squamous cell carcinoma: a case report.Journal of medical case reports · 2025Article
- Clinical time course of the neglected giant sebaceous gland carcinoma.Romanian journal of ophthalmologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
rationaleThough giant malignant tumors arising in the eyelid are rare, they often require extensive surgery for removal along with orbital exenteration. Because of this, repairing orbital defects is an important factor in the surgical strategy. PATIENT CONCERNS: Case 1 was a 78-year-old nomad man who presented in the Department of Ophthalmology with a giant tumor in his right eyelid, which had developed over three years. Clinical examination revealed a huge pigmented, nonhealing ulcerated lesion, approximately 52×44×40 mm in size. Case 2 was a 52-year old rural male complaining of a huge tumor in the right eyelid. Patient medical history revealed that the mass was initially the size of a soybean and gradually grew over 3 years to the size of a fist. DIAGNOSES: Histopathological examination of the tumors revealed that one was a basal cell carcinoma and the other a sebaceous gland carcinoma.
interventionsThe two cases of giant malignant eyelid tumors were surgically excised using rapid frozen section margin control. Different pedicle myocutaneous flaps were used to repair the orbital skin defects. OUTCOMES: Postoperative follow-up showed perfect healing of the pedicle flaps and good patient compliance. The results of these cases indicate that covering exposed orbital cavities with composite pedicle mycuaneous flaps is a simple and practical strategy for orbital reconstruction. Not only does this help maintain orbital stability, but it also provides opportunities for patients to return to normal lives. LESSONS: Although surgical management is often the first option for treatment of giant eyelid tumors, recurrence and mortality due to the tumors is still high after long-term follow-up. Therefore, early discovery and treatment is the best way to control the progression of giant eyelid tumors and enhance survivability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.