Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29309896›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2018

Thresholding functional connectomes by means of mixture modeling.

Natalia Z Bielczyk, Fabian Walocha, Patrick W Ebel, Koen V Haak, Alberto Llera, Jan K Buitelaar, Jeffrey C Glennon, Christian F Beckmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Brain organization of a memory champion.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Natalia Z BielczykDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Centre for Cognitive Neuroimaging, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Geert Groteplein Zuid 10, 6525GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands. Electronic address: natalia.bielczyk@gmail.com.
Fabian WalochaDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Centre for Cognitive Neuroimaging, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; University of Osnabrück, Neuer Graben 29/Schloss, 49074 Osnabrück, Germany.
Patrick W EbelDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Centre for Cognitive Neuroimaging, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Radboud University Nijmegen, Comeniuslaan 4, 6525 HP Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Koen V HaakDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Centre for Cognitive Neuroimaging, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Geert Groteplein Zuid 10, 6525GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Alberto LleraDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Centre for Cognitive Neuroimaging, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Radboud University Nijmegen, Comeniuslaan 4, 6525 HP Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Jan K BuitelaarDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Centre for Cognitive Neuroimaging, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Geert Groteplein Zuid 10, 6525GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Jeffrey C GlennonDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Centre for Cognitive Neuroimaging, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Geert Groteplein Zuid 10, 6525GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Christian F BeckmannDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Centre for Cognitive Neuroimaging, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Geert Groteplein Zuid 10, 6525GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Oxford Centre for Functional MRI of the Brain, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford OX3 9DU, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Functional connectivity has been shown to be a very promising tool for studying the large-scale functional architecture of the human brain. In network research in fMRI, functional connectivity is considered as a set of pair-wise interactions between the nodes of the network. These interactions are typically operationalized through the full or partial correlation between all pairs of regional time series. Estimating the structure of the latent underlying functional connectome from the set of pair-wise partial correlations remains an open research problem though. Typically, this thresholding problem is approached by proportional thresholding, or by means of parametric or non-parametric permutation testing across a cohort of subjects at each possible connection. As an alternative, we propose a data-driven thresholding approach for network matrices on the basis of mixture modeling. This approach allows for creating subject-specific sparse connectomes by modeling the full set of partial correlations as a mixture of low correlation values associated with weak or unreliable edges in the connectome and a sparse set of reliable connections. Consequently, we propose to use alternative thresholding strategy based on the model fit using pseudo-False Discovery Rates derived on the basis of the empirical null estimated as part of the mixture distribution. We evaluate the method on synthetic benchmark fMRI datasets where the underlying network structure is known, and demonstrate that it gives improved performance with respect to the alternative methods for thresholding connectomes, given the canonical thresholding levels. We also demonstrate that mixture modeling gives highly reproducible results when applied to the functional connectomes of the visual system derived from the n-back Working Memory task in the Human Connectome Project. The sparse connectomes obtained from mixture modeling are further discussed in the light of the previous knowledge of the functional architecture of the visual system in humans. We also demonstrate that with use of our method, we are able to extract similar information on the group level as can be achieved with permutation testing even though these two methods are not equivalent. We demonstrate that with both of these methods, we obtain functional decoupling between the two hemispheres in the higher order areas of the visual cortex during visual stimulation as compared to the resting state, which is in line with previous studies suggesting lateralization in the visual processing. However, as opposed to permutation testing, our approach does not require inference at the cohort level and can be used for creating sparse connectomes at the level of a single subject.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalBrainConnectomeHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingNerve NetFalse discovery rateFunctional connectivityMixture modeling

Identifiers

PMID29309896
PMCPMC5981009

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.