Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29309599›Full record

Trial reportHealth education research2018

Feasibility of a text-based smoking cessation intervention in rural older adults.

D Noonan, S Silva, J Njuru, T Bishop, L J Fish, L A Simmons, S H Choi, K I Pollak

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Health education research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Smoking reduction interventions for smoking cessation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

D NoonanDuke University School of Nursing, 307 Trent Drive, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
S SilvaDuke University School of Nursing, 307 Trent Drive, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
J NjuruDuke Office of Clinical Research, Duke University School of Medicine, 2200 West Main Street 10th Floor, Suite 1000. Durham, NC 27705, USA.
T BishopDuke Office of Clinical Research, Duke University School of Medicine, 2200 West Main Street 10th Floor, Suite 1000. Durham, NC 27705, USA.
L J FishCancer Control and Population Sciences, Duke Cancer Institute, 20 Duke Medicine Cir, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
L A SimmonsDuke University School of Nursing, 307 Trent Drive, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
S H ChoiMichigan State University College of Nursing, 1355 Bogue St, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA.
K I PollakDuke Office of Clinical Research, Duke University School of Medicine, 2200 West Main Street 10th Floor, Suite 1000. Durham, NC 27705, USA.
Duke University · USMichigan State University · US

Funding

Collaborations and NCORP Collective ManagementUG1CA189823 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI Evanthia Galanis, Olwen Hahn · 2014 to 2026
$120.6M
NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA189823
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Text-based interventions are effective for smoking cessation, but have not been tested in rural older adults. The purpose of this study was to compare the feasibility, acceptability and preliminary efficacy of a text-based Scheduled Gradual Reduction (SGR) program to a non-SGR text messaging support condition among rural older adults. Adults over 60 years were randomized to either: (i) the SGR program (n = 20), a text-based program to reduce smoking over 4-weeks plus text-based support messages; or (ii) control (n = 20), receipt of text-based support messages only. Participants completed surveys at baseline and end of program to assess feasibility and acceptability of the intervention, and biochemically validated 7-day point prevalence cessation was assessed at end of treatment. Most participants (81%) reported reading all the messages they received. Participants found both interventions useful in quitting smoking (SGR = 57%, Control = 63%) and would recommend it to a friend (SGR = 72%, Control = 79%). Although not statically significant, the SGR group had a higher rate of biochemically validated cessation (SGR = 15%, Control = 5%, Cohen d = 0.67). Among those still smoking, the median percent reduction in cigarettes was 33.3% for both groups. Text-based cessation interventions are feasible, acceptable and can be easily disseminated to rural older adult tobacco users.

Indexed as

Rural PopulationText MessagingAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSmoking CessationSocioeconomic FactorsTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID29309599
PMCPMC6279146
OpenAlexW2781606576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.