Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29308440›Full record

ArticleCurrent opinion in toxicology2017

Quantitative systems toxicology.

Peter Bloomingdale, Conrad Housand, Joshua F Apgar, Bjorn L Millard, Donald E Mager, John M Burke, Dhaval K Shah

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current opinion in toxicology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Machine Learning-BasedChemical research in toxicology · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Boolean network modeling in systems pharmacology.Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Peter BloomingdaleDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, The State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Conrad HousandApplied BioMath, LLC, 55 Old Bedford Road, Suite 208, Lincoln, MA 01773, USA.
Joshua F ApgarApplied BioMath, LLC, 55 Old Bedford Road, Suite 208, Lincoln, MA 01773, USA.
Bjorn L MillardApplied BioMath, LLC, 55 Old Bedford Road, Suite 208, Lincoln, MA 01773, USA.
Donald E MagerDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, The State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA.
John M BurkeApplied BioMath, LLC, 55 Old Bedford Road, Suite 208, Lincoln, MA 01773, USA.
Dhaval K ShahDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, The State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA.

Funding

Translational Systems Pharmacokinetic Models of Novel Anticancer BiologicsR01GM114179 · NIGMS · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI SHAH, DHAVAL K · 2015 to 2019
$1.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM114179
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The overarching goal of modern drug development is to optimize therapeutic benefits while minimizing adverse effects. However, inadequate efficacy and safety concerns remain to be the major causes of drug attrition in clinical development. For the past 80 years, toxicity testing has consisted of evaluating the adverse effects of drugs in animals to predict human health risks. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency recognized the need to develop innovative toxicity testing strategies and asked the National Research Council to develop a long-range vision and strategy for toxicity testing in the 21st century. The vision aims to reduce the use of animals and drug development costs through the integration of computational modeling and

Identifiers

PMID29308440
PMCPMC5754001

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.