ArticleProceedings. IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine2017
Evaluating Automatic Methods to Extract Patients' Supplement Use from Clinical Reports.
Article in Proceedings. IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Patient Dietary Supplements Use: Do Results from Natural Language Processing of Clinical Notes Agree with Survey Data?Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Using natural language processing methods to classify use status of dietary supplements in clinical notes.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2018Article
- Detecting Signals of Associations between Dietary Supplement Use and Mental Disorders from Twitter.2018 IEEE International Conference on Healthcare Informatics Workshops : proceedings : 4-7 June 2018, New York, NY. International Conference on Healthcare Informatics (6th : 2018 : New York, N.Y.). Workshops · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The widespread prevalence of dietary supplements has drawn extensive attention due to the safety and efficacy issue. Clinical notes document a great amount of detailed information on dietary supplement usage, thus providing a rich source for clinical research on supplement safety surveillance. Identification the use status of dietary supplements is one of the initial steps for the ultimate goal of the supplement safety surveillance. In this study, we built rule-based and machine learning-based classifiers to automatically classify the use status of supplements into four categories: Continuing (C), Discontinued (D), Started (S), and Unclassified (U). In comparison to the machine learning classifier trained on the same datasets, the rule-based classifier showed a better performance with F-measure in the C, D, S, U status of 0.93, 0.98, 0.95, and 0.83, respectively. We further analyzed the errors generated by the rule-based classifier. The classifier can be potentially applied to extract supplement information from clinical notes for supporting research and clinical practice related to patient safety on supplement usage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.