Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29308221›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2017

Cognitive bias modification for facial interpretation: a randomized controlled trial of transfer to self-report and cognitive measures in a healthy sample.

S E Peters, J Lumsden, O H Peh, I S Penton-Voak, M R Munafò, O J Robinson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

S E PetersInstitute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3248-2051
J LumsdenSchool of Experimental Psychology, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
O H PehInstitute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, London, UK.
I S Penton-VoakSchool of Experimental Psychology, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
M R MunafòSchool of Experimental Psychology, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4049-993X
O J RobinsonInstitute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, London, UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UU_12013/6Medical Research Council MR/J011819/1Medical Research Council MR/K024280/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cognitive bias modification is a potential low-intensity intervention for mood disorders, but previous studies have shown mixed success. This study explored whether facial interpretation bias modification (FIBM), a similar paradigm designed to shift emotional interpretation (and/or perception) of faces would transfer to: (i) self-reported symptoms and (ii) a battery of cognitive tasks. In a preregistered, double-blind randomized controlled trial, healthy participants received eight online sessions of FIBM (

Indexed as

cognitive bias modificationfacial interpretationrandomized controlled trialtranslational research

Identifiers

PMID29308221
PMCPMC5749989

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.