Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29308185›Full record

ArticleBMC biophysics2018

GPMVs in variable physiological conditions: could they be used for therapy delivery?

Špela Zemljič Jokhadar, Urška Klančnik, Maja Grundner, Tjaša Švelc Kebe, Saša Vrhovec Hartman, Mirjana Liović, Jure Derganc

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC biophysics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Špela Zemljič JokhadarInstitute of biophysics, Faculty of medicine, University of Ljubljana, Vrazov trg 2, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Urška KlančnikInstitute of biophysics, Faculty of medicine, University of Ljubljana, Vrazov trg 2, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Maja GrundnerInstitute of biophysics, Faculty of medicine, University of Ljubljana, Vrazov trg 2, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Tjaša Švelc KebeInstitute of biophysics, Faculty of medicine, University of Ljubljana, Vrazov trg 2, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Saša Vrhovec HartmanInstitute of biophysics, Faculty of medicine, University of Ljubljana, Vrazov trg 2, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Mirjana LiovićInstitute of biochemistry, Faculty of medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Jure DergancInstitute of biophysics, Faculty of medicine, University of Ljubljana, Vrazov trg 2, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
University of Ljubljana · SIJožef Stefan Institute · SI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCell based carriers are increasingly recognized as a good system for cargo delivery to cells. One of the reasons is their biocompatibility and low toxicity compared to artificial systems. Giant plasma membrane vesicles (GPMV) derive from the cell plasma membrane. Thus they offer the closest approximation to it, which makes them good candidates for potential drug delivery systems. To evaluate the applicability of GPMVs as carriers, we analyzed their basic biophysical properties to test their robustness in the face of changeable physiological conditions, as well as their ability to translocate across the membrane into cells.

resultsGPMVs formed from human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC) sustain a drastic osmotic challenge (50-500 mOsmoL/kg) unlike giant unilamelar vesicles (GUVs). In hyper-osmotic solutions the average volume decreases and membrane invaginations form, while in the hypo-osmolar buffer the volume of GPMVs increases and these changes were not reversible. The membranes of flaccid GPMVs started to wrinkle unevenly giving rise to buds after exposure to lipopolysaccharide (LPS). The shape changes in GUVs are reversible in contrast to GPMVs after LPS removal. GPMVs exposed to fluorescent LPS exhibited a signal that remained visible in some GPMVs even after LPS removal, which was never the case with GUVs. Calcein penetrated both into GUVs and GPMVs, however after the removal from the bulk solution some of the GPMVs still exhibited very bright signal, while in GUVs only a weak fluorescent signal was detected. We could also see that practically all GPMVs incorporated dextran initially, but after the dextran solution was changed with the initial non-fluorescent solution it remained only in 20% of them. The majority of HUVEC cells displayed a fluorescent signal after the incubation with GPMVs that contained fluorescently labeled dextran.

conclusionOur findings indicate that GPMVs behave quite differently from artificially made giant phospholipid vesicles and the changes induced by the different treatments we subjected them to are not reversible. We also demonstrate that different substances can be both loaded into them and delivered into cells, so GPMVs may be of potential use as cargo/therapy delivery systems.

Indexed as

Delivery systemGiant plasma membrane vesiclesLipopolysaccharideOsmotic stress

Identifiers

PMID29308185
PMCPMC5751824
OpenAlexW2782209781

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.