Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29308120›Full record

ArticleMedChemComm2017

A systematic analysis of atomic protein-ligand interactions in the PDB.

Renato Ferreira de Freitas, Matthieu Schapira

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MedChemComm, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 192 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
192citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

192 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Activity of Secondary Metabolites from Marine-DerivedInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  4. Bicyclo[1.1.1]pentane as a Phenyl Isosteric Replacement.ACS medicinal chemistry letters · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

132 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Renato Ferreira de FreitasStructural Genomics Consortium , University of Toronto , Toronto , ON M5G 1L7 , Canada . Email: matthieu.schapira@utoronto.ca.ORCID 0000-0001-6195-4236
Matthieu SchapiraStructural Genomics Consortium , University of Toronto , Toronto , ON M5G 1L7 , Canada . Email: matthieu.schapira@utoronto.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-1047-3309

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As the protein databank (PDB) recently passed the cap of 123 456 structures, it stands more than ever as an important resource not only to analyze structural features of specific biological systems, but also to study the prevalence of structural patterns observed in a large body of unrelated structures, that may reflect rules governing protein folding or molecular recognition. Here, we compiled a list of 11 016 unique structures of small-molecule ligands bound to proteins - 6444 of which have experimental binding affinity - representing 750 873 protein-ligand atomic interactions, and analyzed the frequency, geometry and impact of each interaction type. We find that hydrophobic interactions are generally enriched in high-efficiency ligands, but polar interactions are over-represented in fragment inhibitors. While most observations extracted from the PDB will be familiar to seasoned medicinal chemists, less expected findings, such as the high number of C-H···O hydrogen bonds or the relatively frequent amide-π stacking between the backbone amide of proteins and aromatic rings of ligands, uncover underused ligand design strategies.

Identifiers

PMID29308120
PMCPMC5708362

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.