Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29308065›Full record

ArticleCEUR workshop proceedings2016

Clinical Information Extraction at the CLEF eHealth Evaluation lab 2016.

Aurélie Névéol, K Bretonnel Cohen, Cyril Grouin, Thierry Hamon, Thomas Lavergne, Liadh Kelly, Lorraine Goeuriot, Grégoire Rey, Aude Robert, Xavier Tannier and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CEUR workshop proceedings, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Improving biomedical entity linking for complex entity mentions with LLM-based text simplification.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Aurélie NévéolLIMSI, CNRS, Université Paris-Saclay, Orsay, France.
K Bretonnel CohenLIMSI, CNRS, Université Paris-Saclay, Orsay, France.
Cyril GrouinLIMSI, CNRS, Université Paris-Saclay, Orsay, France.
Thierry HamonLIMSI, CNRS, Université Paris-Saclay, Orsay, France.
Thomas LavergneLIMSI, CNRS, Université Paris-Saclay, Orsay, France.
Liadh KellyADAPT Centre, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland.
Lorraine GoeuriotUniversité Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France.
Grégoire ReyINSERM-CépiDC, Paris, France.
Aude RobertINSERM-CépiDC, Paris, France.
Xavier TannierLIMSI, CNRS, Université Paris-Saclay, Orsay, France.
Pierre ZweigenbaumLIMSI, CNRS, Université Paris-Saclay, Orsay, France.

Funding

Technology Development for a MolBio Knowledge-BaseR01LM008111 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI HUNTER, LAWRENCE E · 2004 to 2021
$9.7M
Bio Text NLPR01LM009254 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI HUNTER, LAWRENCE E · 2006 to 2018
$5.9M
NLM NIH HHS R01 LM008111NLM NIH HHS R01 LM009254
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper reports on Task 2 of the 2016 CLEF eHealth evaluation lab which extended the previous information extraction tasks of ShARe/CLEF eHealth evaluation labs. The task continued with named entity recognition and normalization in French narratives, as offered in CLEF eHealth 2015. Named entity recognition involved ten types of entities including

Indexed as

Biomedical TextEntity LinkingFrenchNamed Entity RecognitionNatural Language ProcessingText ClassificationUMLS

Identifiers

PMID29308065
PMCPMC5756095

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.