ArticleSocial work in mental health2017
Managing physical and mental health conditions: Consumer perspectives on integrated care.
Article in Social work in mental health, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Service and Treatment Factors as Predictors of Satisfaction with Mental Health Services Among Service Users with Psychosis.Community mental health journal · 2025Article
- Physical Health Views Among Individuals Experiencing Mental Illness: A Mixed-Methods Study of Self-Reported Health and Contributing Factors.International journal of mental health nursing · 2025Article
- Mental health consumers' perspectives of physical health interventions: An integrative review.International journal of mental health nursing · 2022Review
- Consumption Pattern and Mental Health of Employees Based on Big Data Analysis.Journal of environmental and public health · 2022Article
- A critical review of research into mental health consumers' perspectives on their physical health: Is there an absence of consumers in the design, conduct, analysis and reporting of this research?Frontiers in public health · 2022Review
- Experiences of barriers to trans-sectoral treatment of patients with severe mental illness. A qualitative study.International journal of mental health systems · 2020Article
- Perspectives of Individuals With Serious Mental Illness on a Reverse-Colocated Care Model: A Qualitative Study.Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.) · 2019Article
- What integrated care means from an older person's perspective? A scoping review protocol.BMJ open · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDespite the growing trend of integrating primary care and mental health services, little research has documented how consumers with severe mental illnesses manage comorbid conditions or view integrated services.
objectivesWe sought to better understand how consumers perceive and manage both mental and physical health conditions and their views of integrated services.
methodsWe conducted semi-structured interviews with consumers receiving primary care services integrated in a community mental health setting.
resultsConsumers described a range of strategies to deal with physical health conditions and generally viewed mental and physical health conditions as impacting one another. Consumers viewed integration of primary care and mental health services favorably, specifically its convenience, friendliness and knowledge of providers, and collaboration between providers.
conclusionsAlthough integration was viewed positively, consumers with SMI may need a myriad of strategies and supports to both initiate and sustain lifestyle changes that address common physical health problems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.