Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29308055›Full record

ArticlePsychology of men & masculinity2017

Masculinity Beliefs and Colorectal Cancer Screening in Male Veterans.

Shannon M Christy, Catherine E Mosher, Susan M Rawl, David A Haggstrom

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychology of men & masculinity, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Associations between Anti-Gay Prejudice, Traditional Masculine Self-Concept, and Colorectal Cancer Screening-Related Outcomes among Black and White Men in the United States.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2025
    Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Shannon M ChristyHealth Outcomes and Behavior Program, Division of Population Science, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA.
Catherine E MosherDepartment of Psychology, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Susan M RawlSchool of Nursing, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
David A HaggstromHSR&D Center for Health Information and Communication, Richard L. Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis · USMoffitt Cancer Center · USRichard L. Roudebush VA Medical Center · USUniversity of Indianapolis · US

Funding

Training in Research for Behavioral Oncology and Cancer Control ProgramR25CA117865 · NCI · INDIANA UNIV-PURDUE UNIV AT INDIANAPOLIS · PI CHAMPION, VICTORIA LEE · 2006 to 2015
$4.1M
Behavioral Oncology Education & Career DevelopmentR25CA090314 · NCI · H. LEE MOFFITT CANCER CTR &RES INST · PI BRANDON, THOMAS H · 2003 to 2018
$4.0M
Interdisciplinary Training in Cancer Prevention and ControlT32CA117865 · NCI · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI Victoria Lee Champion, Catherine E Mosher · 2016 to 2026
$2.4M
Telephone Symptom Management for Advanced Lung Cancer Patients and CaregiversK07CA168883 · NCI · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI MOSHER, CATHERINE E · 2013 to 2017
$682k
Research and Training for Behavioral Oncology InterventionsK05CA175048 · NCI · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI CHAMPION, VICTORIA LEE · 2014 to 2018
$484k
NCI NIH HHS K05 CA175048NCI NIH HHS K07 CA168883NCI NIH HHS R25 CA090314NCI NIH HHS R25 CA117865NCI NIH HHS T32 CA117865
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As the third most common cause of cancer death among United States men, colorectal cancer (CRC) represents a significant threat to men's health. Although adherence to CRC screening has the potential to reduce CRC mortality by approximately half, men's current rates of adherence fall below national screening objectives. In qualitative studies, men have reported forgoing screenings involving the rectum (e.g., colonoscopy) due to concern about breaching masculinity norms. However, the extent to which masculinity beliefs predict men's CRC screening adherence has yet to be examined. The current study tested the hypothesis that greater endorsement of masculinity beliefs (i.e., self-reliance, risk-taking, heterosexual self-presentation, and primacy of work) would be associated with a lower likelihood of adherence to CRC screening with any test and with colonoscopy specifically. Participants were 327 men aged 51-75 at average risk for CRC who were accessing primary care services at a Midwestern Veterans Affairs Medical Center. Contrary to hypotheses, masculinity beliefs did not predict CRC screening outcomes in hierarchical regression analyses that controlled for demographic predictors of screening. Although results are largely inconsistent with masculinity theory and prior qualitative findings, further research is needed to determine the degree to which findings generalize to other populations and settings.

Indexed as

colorectal cancer screeningmasculinitymen’s healthpreventive health behaviorveterans

Identifiers

PMID29308055
PMCPMC5754009
OpenAlexW2434718369

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.