Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29307988›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of gastroenterology2017

Procalcitonin in inflammatory bowel disease: Drawbacks and opportunities.

Giuseppe Lippi, Fabian Sanchis-Gomar

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of gastroenterology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Non-Infectious Causes for Elevated Procalcitonin.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Nanobiosensors for procalcitonin (PCT) analysis.Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2024
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Giuseppe LippiSection of Clinical Biochemistry, University of Verona, Verona 37134, Italy. giuseppe.lippi@univr.it.
Fabian Sanchis-GomarLeon H. Charney Division of Cardiology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, United States.
INCLIVA Health Research Institute · ESNew York University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The measurement of procalcitonin has recently become a mainstay for the diagnosis and therapeutic management of severe bacterial infections, especially those sustained by Gram-negative bacteria. Therefore, the aim of this article is to provide a narrative overview on the potential role of procalcitonin measurement in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). According to the available scientific literature, the clinical significance of procalcitonin for diagnosing IBD or monitoring disease activity remains elusive, and its association with disease severity is confined to a limited number of case-control studies, with low sample size. Nevertheless, literature data also suggests that a supranormal procalcitonin serum concentration (

Indexed as

Bacterial InfectionsBiomarkersCalcitoninClostridioides difficileGastrointestinal TractHumansInflammatory Bowel DiseasesProtein PrecursorsSeverity of Illness IndexBiomarkersCalcitoninProtein PrecursorsChron’s diseaseIntestinal bowel diseaseProcalcitoninUlcerative colitis

Identifiers

PMID29307988
PMCPMC5743499
OpenAlexW2776652811

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.