Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29307585›Full record

ArticleNeuropsychologia2018

Driving the brain towards creativity and intelligence: A network control theory analysis.

Yoed N Kenett, John D Medaglia, Roger E Beaty, Qunlin Chen, Richard F Betzel, Sharon L Thompson-Schill, Jiang Qiu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuropsychologia, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yoed N KenettDepartment of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA. Electronic address: yoedk@sas.upenn.edu.
John D MedagliaDepartment of Psychology, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Department of Neurology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Roger E BeatyDepartment of Psychology and Center for Brain Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Qunlin ChenSchool of Psychology, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China.
Richard F BetzelDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Sharon L Thompson-SchillDepartment of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Jiang QiuSchool of Psychology, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China.

Funding

Linguistic and NonLinguistic Functions of Frontal CortexR01DC009209 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI THOMPSONSCHILL, SHARON L · 2008 to 2018
$5.2M
Conceptual CombinationR01DC015359 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI THOMPSONSCHILL, SHARON L · 2016 to 2020
$2.5M
Dynamic Network Neuroscience and Control Theory: Toward Interventions for Cognitive Control DysfunctionDP5OD021352 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI MEDAGLIA, JOHN · 2015 to 2019
$2.0M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC009209NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC015359NIH HHS DP5 OD021352
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High-level cognitive constructs, such as creativity and intelligence, entail complex and multiple processes, including cognitive control processes. Recent neurocognitive research on these constructs highlight the importance of dynamic interaction across neural network systems and the role of cognitive control processes in guiding such a dynamic interaction. How can we quantitatively examine the extent and ways in which cognitive control contributes to creativity and intelligence? To address this question, we apply a computational network control theory (NCT) approach to structural brain imaging data acquired via diffusion tensor imaging in a large sample of participants, to examine how NCT relates to individual differences in distinct measures of creative ability and intelligence. Recent application of this theory at the neural level is built on a model of brain dynamics, which mathematically models patterns of inter-region activity propagated along the structure of an underlying network. The strength of this approach is its ability to characterize the potential role of each brain region in regulating whole-brain network function based on its anatomical fingerprint and a simplified model of node dynamics. We find that intelligence is related to the ability to "drive" the brain system into easy to reach neural states by the right inferior parietal lobe and lower integration abilities in the left retrosplenial cortex. We also find that creativity is related to the ability to "drive" the brain system into difficult to reach states by the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (inferior frontal junction) and higher integration abilities in sensorimotor areas. Furthermore, we found that different facets of creativity-fluency, flexibility, and originality-relate to generally similar but not identical network controllability processes. We relate our findings to general theories on intelligence and creativity.

Indexed as

Brain MappingCreativityBrainDiffusion Tensor ImagingFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedIntelligenceMaleModels, NeurologicalNeural PathwaysNeuropsychological TestsWhite MatterYoung AdultCognitive controlCreativityIntelligenceNetwork control theory

Identifiers

PMID29307585
PMCPMC6034981

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.