Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29307527›Full record

Trial reportThe lancet. Psychiatry2018

Multisystemic therapy versus management as usual in the treatment of adolescent antisocial behaviour (START): a pragmatic, randomised controlled, superiority trial.

Peter Fonagy, Stephen Butler, David Cottrell, Stephen Scott, Stephen Pilling, Ivan Eisler, Peter Fuggle, Abdullah Kraam, Sarah Byford, James Wason and 5 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readPragmatic Clinical TrialRandomized Controlled TrialEquivalence Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The lancet. Psychiatry, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
13.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 102 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Preventing Youth Crime and Violence: Intervention and Evaluation Issues.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Evidence Base Update of Psychosocial Treatments for Adolescents with Disruptive Behavior.Journal of clinical child and adolescent psychology : the official journal for the Society of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, American Psychological Association, Division 53 · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Promoting Learning from Null or Negative Results in Prevention Science Trials.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Peter FonagyResearch Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK. Electronic address: p.fonagy@ucl.ac.uk.
Stephen ButlerResearch Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK.
David CottrellLeeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Stephen ScottInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Stephen PillingResearch Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK.
Ivan EislerInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Peter FuggleAnna Freud National Centre for Children and Families, London, UK.
Abdullah KraamUniversity of Leeds and South West Yorkshire Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Leeds, UK.
Sarah ByfordInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
James WasonMRC Biostatistics Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Rachel EllisonResearch Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK.
Elizabeth SimesResearch Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK.
Poushali GanguliInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Elizabeth AllisonResearch Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK.
Ian M GoodyerDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
University College London · GBKing's College London · GBUniversity of Leeds · GBAnna Freud Centre · GBMRC Biostatistics Unit · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UP_1302/4Medical Research Council MC_UU_00002/6Medical Research Council MR/N028171/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdolescent antisocial behaviour is a major health and social problem. Studies in the USA have shown that multisystemic therapy reduces such behaviour and the number of criminal offences committed by this group. However, findings outside the USA are equivocal. We aimed to assess the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of multisystemic therapy versus management as usual in the treatment of adolescent antisocial behaviour.

methodsWe did an 18 month, multisite, pragmatic, randomised controlled, superiority trial in England. Eligible participants aged 11-17 years with moderate-to-severe antisocial behaviour had at least three severity criteria indicating past difficulties across several settings and one of five general inclusion criteria for antisocial behaviour. We randomly assigned families (1:1) using stochastic minimisation, stratifying for treatment centre, sex, age at enrolment to study, and age at onset of antisocial behaviour, to receive either management as usual or 3-5 months of multisystemic therapy followed by management as usual. Research assistants and investigators were masked to treatment allocation; the participants could not be masked. The primary outcome was out-of-home placement at 18 months. The primary analysis included all randomised participants for whom data were available. This trial is registered, number ISRCTN77132214. Follow-up of the trial is still ongoing.

findingsBetween Feb 4, 2010, and Sept 1, 2012, 1076 families were referred to nine multi-agency panels, 684 of whom were assigned to management as usual (n=342) or multisystemic therapy followed by management as usual (n=342). At 18 months, the proportion of participants in out-of-home placement was not significantly different between the groups (13% [43/340] in the multisystemic therapy group vs 11% [36/335] in the management-as-usual group; odds ratio 1·25, 95% CI 0·77-2·05; p=0·37).

interpretationThe findings do not support that multisystemic therapy should be used over management as usual as the intervention of choice for adolescents with moderate-to-severe antisocial behaviour.

fundingDepartment for Children, Schools and Families, Department of Health.

Indexed as

Adolescent BehaviorAdolescent Health ServicesAdolescentConduct DisorderCost-Benefit AnalysisCrimeEnglandFamilyFemaleHumansMalePsychotherapyTime FactorsTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID29307527
PMCPMC6697182
OpenAlexW2781602881

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.