Is there a common mechanism underlying air pollution exposures and reproductive outcomes noted in epidemiologic and in vitro fertilization lab-based studies?

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Air pollution and pregnancy.Seminars in perinatology · 2023
   Article
2. Effects of Environmental EDCs on Oocyte Quality, Embryo Development, and the Outcome in Human IVF Process.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2021
   Article
3. Acute effects of air pollutants on spontaneous pregnancy loss: a case-crossover study.Fertility and sterility · 2019
   Article
4. Effect of the Air Filtration System Replacement on Embryo Quality in the Assisted Reproduction Laboratory.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2018
   Review

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  Ambient air pollution and the risk of pregnancy loss: a prospective cohort study.2018

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as