Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29307099›Full record

ReviewJournal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics2018

Boolean network modeling in systems pharmacology.

Peter Bloomingdale, Van Anh Nguyen, Jin Niu, Donald E Mager

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 88 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Unveiling toxicological adverse outcomes: toward construction and simulation of large-scale networks.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Mathematical Modeling of Neuroinflammation in Neurodegenerative Diseases.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. In silico Methods for Identification of Potential Therapeutic Targets.Interdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences · 2022
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Peter BloomingdaleDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, 431 Kapoor Hall, Buffalo, NY, 14214, USA.
Van Anh NguyenDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, 431 Kapoor Hall, Buffalo, NY, 14214, USA.
Jin NiuDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, 431 Kapoor Hall, Buffalo, NY, 14214, USA.
Donald E MagerDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, 431 Kapoor Hall, Buffalo, NY, 14214, USA. dmager@buffalo.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-4848-0440
University at Buffalo, State University of New York · US

Funding

MATHEMATICAL MODELS IN PHARMACODYNAMICSR01GM057980 · NIGMS · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI JUSKO, WILLIAM J., KRZYZANSKI, WOJCIECH · 1998 to 2013
$3.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM057980
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Quantitative systems pharmacology (QSP) is an emerging discipline that aims to discover how drugs modulate the dynamics of biological components in molecular and cellular networks and the impact of those perturbations on human pathophysiology. The integration of systems-based experimental and computational approaches is required to facilitate the advancement of this field. QSP models typically consist of a series of ordinary differential equations (ODE). However, this mathematical framework requires extensive knowledge of parameters pertaining to biological processes, which is often unavailable. An alternative framework that does not require knowledge of system-specific parameters, such as Boolean network modeling, could serve as an initial foundation prior to the development of an ODE-based model. Boolean network models have been shown to efficiently describe, in a qualitative manner, the complex behavior of signal transduction and gene/protein regulatory processes. In addition to providing a starting point prior to quantitative modeling, Boolean network models can also be utilized to discover novel therapeutic targets and combinatorial treatment strategies. Identifying drug targets using a network-based approach could supplement current drug discovery methodologies and help to fill the innovation gap across the pharmaceutical industry. In this review, we discuss the process of developing Boolean network models and the various analyses that can be performed to identify novel drug targets and combinatorial approaches. An example for each of these analyses is provided using a previously developed Boolean network of signaling pathways in multiple myeloma. Selected examples of Boolean network models of human (patho-)physiological systems are also reviewed in brief.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalAntineoplastic AgentsDrug DiscoveryHumansMultiple MyelomaSignal TransductionSystems BiologyAntineoplastic AgentsBoolean networkDrug discoveryModeling and simulationQuantitative systems pharmacologySystems biology

Identifiers

PMID29307099
PMCPMC6531050
OpenAlexW2781578762

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.