Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29307097›Full record

ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2018

Robotic inguinal lymph node dissection for melanoma: a novel approach to a complicated problem.

G Alan Hyde, Nathan L Jung, Alvaro A Valle, Syamal D Bhattacharya, Christopher E Keel

Abstract readCase Reports
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Combined robotic inguinal and iliac-obturator lymphadenectomy for stage III skin cancers: Surgical technique and preliminary results.The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

G Alan HydeDepartment of Surgery, University of Tennessee College of Medicine Chattanooga, 979 East Third Street, Suite B-401, Chattanooga, TN, 37403, USA. alanhyde1@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4450-5452
Nathan L JungDepartment of Urology, University of Tennessee College of Medicine Chattanooga, 979 East Third Street, Suite C-925, Chattanooga, TN, 37403, USA.
Alvaro A ValleDepartment of Surgery, University of Tennessee College of Medicine Chattanooga, 979 East Third Street, Suite B-401, Chattanooga, TN, 37403, USA.
Syamal D BhattacharyaDepartment of Surgery, University of Tennessee College of Medicine Chattanooga, 979 East Third Street, Suite B-401, Chattanooga, TN, 37403, USA.
Christopher E KeelDepartment of Urology, University of Tennessee College of Medicine Chattanooga, 979 East Third Street, Suite C-925, Chattanooga, TN, 37403, USA.
University of Tennessee at Chattanooga · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIndications for superficial inguinal lymph node (ILN) dissection in melanoma include fine needle aspiration or clinically positive ILN and sentinel lymph nodes (SLN). Open inguinal lymphadenectomy may be complicated by poor wound healing, deep vein thrombosis, and lymphedema. Technical considerations and case series of a novel surgical approach, robotic inguinal lymphadenectomy, are presented.

methodsThis is a case series of four robotic ILN dissections for melanoma at a tertiary care facility. Each patient had previously diagnosed melanoma by lymph node biopsy. Physician and patient jointly decided on robotic procedure after disclosure of this novel approach. Demographic, complication, pathological outcome, estimated blood loss (EBL), operative time, and length of stay (LOS) data were collected.

resultsNo cases were aborted due to technical difficulty. The median patient age was 44.5 years (range 22-53 years) and median BMI was 27.5 (range 20.4-40.2). Operative time range was 120-231 min and EBL from 0 to 100 mL. Median nodal count was 5.5 (range 1-14 nodes). Patient LOS ranged from 0 (discharged from post anesthesia care unit) to 96 h. There was one complication of port site cellulitis, one seroma formation, and no instances of lymphedema. To date, there have been no deaths or melanoma recurrences in this population.

conclusionRecent data suggest a minimum node count of six to seven for inguinal dissection. Of our four dissections, two were above this threshold and there were minimal postoperative complications. Given our limited sample size, future focus should be on increasing the data on this approach to optimize surgical outcomes and oncologic results.

Indexed as

AdultCutaneous Malignant MelanomaFemaleHumansInguinal CanalLength of StayLymphatic MetastasisLymph Node ExcisionMaleMelanomaMiddle AgedOperative TimePostoperative ComplicationsRobotic Surgical ProceduresSkin NeoplasmsYoung AdultLymphadenectomyMelanomaRobotic inguinal

Identifiers

PMID29307097
OpenAlexW2781493377

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.