Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29307057›Full record

ReviewHernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery2018

Comparison of hernia registries: the CORE project.

I Kyle-Leinhase, F Köckerling, L N Jørgensen, A Montgomery, J F Gillion, J A P Rodriguez, W Hope, F Muysoms

Abstract readComparative StudyReview
In one paragraph

Review in Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 71 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
71citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

71 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. What is the association between BMI classes and the outcome in incisional hernia repair?Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2025
    Article
  13. Groin hernia.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Protocol for the AFTERHERNIA Project: patient-reported outcomes of groin and ventral hernia repair.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

11 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

I Kyle-LeinhaseEuraHS and Department of Surgery, Maria Middelares Hospital, Buitenring Sint-Denijs 30, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
F KöckerlingHERNIAMED and Department of Surgery and Center for Minimally Invasive Surgery, Academic Teaching Hospital of Charité Medical School, Vivantes Hospital Spandau, Neue Bergstrasse 6, 13585, Berlin, Germany. ferdinand.koeckerling@vivantes.de.
L N JørgensenDANISH HERNIA DATABASE and Digestive Disease Center, Bispebjerg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
A MontgomerySWEDISH HERNIA REGISTRY and Department of Clinical Sciences, Skåne University Hospital Malmö, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.
J F GillionCLUB HERNIE and Unité de Chirurgie Viscérale et Digestive, Hôpital Privé d'Antony, Antony, France.
J A P RodriguezEVEREG and Hospital Universitario del Mar, Barcelona, Spain.
W HopeAHSQC and New Hanover Regional Medical Center, Wilmington, USA.
F MuysomsEuraHS and Department of Surgery, Maria Middelares Hospital, Buitenring Sint-Denijs 30, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe aim of the international CORE project was to explore the databases of the existing hernia registries and compare them in content and outcome variables.

methodsThe CORE project was initiated with representatives from all established hernia registries (Danish Hernia Database, Swedish Hernia Registry, Herniamed, EuraHS, Club Hernie, EVEREG, AHSQC) in March 2015 in Berlin. The following categories were used to compare the registries: initiation and funding, data collection and use for certification of hernia centers, patient data and data protection, operative data, registration of complications and follow-up data.

resultsThe Danish Hernia Database is the only one to qualify as a genuine national registry where participation is compulsory for entry of all procedures by all surgeons performing a hernia operation. All other registries have to be considered as voluntary and completeness of data depends upon the participating hospitals and surgeons. Only the Danish Hernia Database and the Swedish Hernia Registry are publicly funded. All other registries are reliant on financial support from the medical technology industry. As an incentive for voluntary participation in a hernia registry, hospitals or surgeons are issued a certificate confirming that they are taking part in a quality assurance study for hernia surgery. Due to data protection and privacy regulations, most registries are obliged or have chosen to enter their patient data anonymously or coded. The Danish Hernia Database and Swedish Hernia Registry utilize a national personal patient code. In the Herniamed Registry, patient data are saved in a coded and anonymous format after obtaining the patient's informed consent.

conclusionDespite the differences in the way data are collected for each of the listed hernia registries, the data are indispensable in clinical research.

Indexed as

HerniaDatabases, FactualEuropeHumansInternationalityRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRegistriesClinical trial platformHernia databaseHernia registry

Identifiers

PMID29307057
PMCPMC6061062

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.