Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29307053›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology2018

Antipsychotics use: 2006-2013 trends in prevalence and incidence and characterization of users.

François Montastruc, Anne Bénard-Laribière, Pernelle Noize, Elodie Pambrun, Fabienne Diaz-Bazin, Marie Tournier, Bernard Bégaud, Antoine Pariente

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Prevalence of use of antipsychotic drugs in the elderly in Catalonia.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

François MontastrucInserm, Bordeaux Population Health Research Center, Team Pharmacoepidemiology, UMR 1219, University Bordeaux, F-33000, Bordeaux, France. francois.montastruc@univ-tlse3.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7056-8126
Anne Bénard-LaribièreInserm, Bordeaux Population Health Research Center, Team Pharmacoepidemiology, UMR 1219, University Bordeaux, F-33000, Bordeaux, France.
Pernelle NoizeInserm, Bordeaux Population Health Research Center, Team Pharmacoepidemiology, UMR 1219, University Bordeaux, F-33000, Bordeaux, France.
Elodie PambrunInserm, Bordeaux Population Health Research Center, Team Pharmacoepidemiology, UMR 1219, University Bordeaux, F-33000, Bordeaux, France.
Fabienne Diaz-BazinInserm, Bordeaux Population Health Research Center, Team Pharmacoepidemiology, UMR 1219, University Bordeaux, F-33000, Bordeaux, France.
Marie TournierInserm, Bordeaux Population Health Research Center, Team Pharmacoepidemiology, UMR 1219, University Bordeaux, F-33000, Bordeaux, France.
Bernard BégaudInserm, Bordeaux Population Health Research Center, Team Pharmacoepidemiology, UMR 1219, University Bordeaux, F-33000, Bordeaux, France.
Antoine ParienteInserm, Bordeaux Population Health Research Center, Team Pharmacoepidemiology, UMR 1219, University Bordeaux, F-33000, Bordeaux, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe present study was conducted to describe antipsychotic (AP) prevalent and incident use, characteristics of AP users, and their trends in the French population.

methodsA cross-sectional study was repeated yearly from January 1, 2007 to December 31, 2013 (for prevalence analysis) or to December 31, 2012 (for incidence analysis) using the French Health Insurance reimbursement database (Echantillon Généraliste de Bénéficiaires, EGB). For each year studied, prevalent and incident AP users were described in terms of age and gender overall, and according to the type of AP (FGAPs or SGAPs) used at index date. In addition, concurrent medications and comorbidities that a priori contraindicate the use of drugs having atropinic properties were researched.

resultsPrevalence and incidence remained relatively stable along the 2007-2013 period. Trends slightly decreased, from 2.07% (n = 10,252) to 2.05% (n = 11,015) for prevalence, and from 0.73% (n = 3461) to 0.66% (n = 3363) for incidence, especially in elderly, in contrast of children and adolescents (+ 39% for prevalence, from 184 to 271). The number of coprescribed drugs was found high (median = 5) and remained constant over time. In 2013, about 7% of prevalent AP users presented with a comorbidity increasing the risk of atropinic ADRs, and 36% used at least one concurrent atropinic drug. In incident AP users, these numbers were of 8 and 29%, respectively.

conclusionsThe present study highlighted a marked shift from FGAPs toward SGAPs, as well as an increase in AP use in children and adolescents in France.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAntipsychotic AgentsDatabases, FactualDrug UtilizationFemaleFranceHumansMaleMiddle AgedNational Health ProgramsYoung AdultAntipsychotic AgentsAntipsychoticsDrug utilizationIncidenceInsurance health reimbursementPharmacoepidemiologyPrevalence

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.