ArticleBMC cancer2018
Incidence of bone metastases in patients with solid tumors: analysis of oncology electronic medical records in the United States.
Article in BMC cancer, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 204 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
204 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 370 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparative evaluation of treatment strategies for femoral metastases: endoprosthesis reconstruction versus intramedullary nailing.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2025Pooled it
- Efficacy, safety and economy of denosumab and zoledronic acid in the treatment of bone metastases of solid tumors and multiple myeloma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Pooled it
- Bibliometric analysis of bone metastases from lung cancer research from 2004 to 2023.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Pooled it
- Role of bone marrow adipocytes in bone metastasis development and progression: a systematic review.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2023Pooled it
- Long-term impact of bone-modifying agents for the treatment of bone metastases: a systematic review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021Pooled it
- Symptomatic skeletal-related events in patients receiving longer term bone-modifying agents for bone metastases from breast and castration resistant prostate cancers.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022Trial
- Value of CT Radiomics and Clinical Features in Predicting Bone Metastases in Patients with NSCLC.Contrast media & molecular imaging · 2022Trial
- Bone targeted therapy and skeletal related events in the era of enzalutamide and abiraterone acetate for castration resistant prostate cancer with bone metastases.Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases · 2021Trial
- Research on the predicting power of the revised Tokuhashi system: how much time can surgery give to patients with short life expectancy?International journal of clinical oncology · 2020Trial
- Comparison ofBMC medical imaging · 2020Trial
- Pembrolizumab for Treatment-Refractory Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: Multicohort, Open-Label Phase II KEYNOTE-199 Study.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2020Trial
- Article
- Proteoglycans as Molecular Regulators of Bone Metastasis: Extracellular Matrix Remodeling, Tumor-Bone Crosstalk, Dormancy, and Therapeutic Opportunities.Biomolecules · 2026Review
- BoneCoT: multicentre validation of a whole-body skeleton foundation model for bone metastases guided by clinician-derived chain of thought.Nature biomedical engineering · 2026Article
- Tumor-specific outcomes in spinal metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of spine surgery (Hong Kong) · 2026Article
- Hijacking the bone niche: mechanistic insights into bone metastasis in breast cancer.Bone research · 2026Review
- Exosome-derived LncRNAs in bone remodeling: recent advances and future directions for bone disease therapy.Stem cell research & therapy · 2026Review
- Nanoparticle Strategies for Bone Metastasis Immunotherapy: Targeting, Immune Reprogramming and Combination Therapy.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- Feasibility of No-Code Deep Learning for Diagnosing Bone Metastasis in Bone Scans: A Comparative Study of Teachable Machine and ResNet.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- Natural language processing to identify documented pain preceding radiation therapy for bone metastases.JNCI cancer spectrum · 2026Article
144 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBone metastases commonly occur in conjunction with solid tumors, and are associated with serious bone complications. Population-based estimates of bone metastasis incidence are limited, often based on autopsy data, and may not reflect current treatment patterns.
methodsElectronic medical records (OSCER, Oncology Services Comprehensive Electronic Records, 569,000 patients, 52 US cancer centers) were used to identify patients ≥18 years with a solid tumor diagnosis recorded between 1/1/2004 and 12/31/2013, excluding patients with hematologic tumors or multiple primaries. Each patient's index date was set to the date of his or her first solid tumor diagnosis in the selection period. Kaplan-Meier analyses were used to quantify the cumulative incidence of bone metastasis with follow-up for each patient from the index date to the earliest of the following events: last clinic visit in the OSCER database, occurrence of a new primary tumor or bone metastasis, end of study (12/31/2014). Incidence estimates and associated 95% confidence intervals (CI) are provided for up to 10 years of follow-up for all tumor types combined and stratified by tumor type and stage at diagnosis.
resultsAmong 382,733 study patients (mean age 64 years; mean follow-up 940 days), breast (36%), lung (16), and colorectal (12%) tumors were most common. Mean time to bone metastasis was 400 days (1.1 years). Cumulative incidence of bone metastasis was 2.9% (2.9-3.0) at 30 days, 4.8% (4.7-4.8) at one year, 5.6% (5.5-5.6) at two years, 6.9% (6.8-7.0) at five years, and 8.4% (8.3-8.5) at ten years. Incidence varied substantially by tumor type with prostate cancer patients at highest risk (18% - 29%) followed by lung, renal or breast cancer. Cumulative incidence of bone metastasis increased by stage at diagnosis, with markedly higher incidence among patients diagnosed at Stage IV of whom11% had bone metastases diagnosed within 30 days.
conclusionsThese estimates of bone metastasis incidence represent the experience of a population with longer follow-up than previously published, and represent experience in the recent treatment landscape. Underestimation is possible given reliance on coded diagnoses but the clinical detail available in electronic medical records contributes to the accuracy of these estimates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.