Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29305910›Full record

ReviewNeuroImage2018

The development of brain white matter microstructure.

Catherine Lebel, Sean Deoni

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in NeuroImage, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 351 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
351citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

351 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Spatiotemporal white-matter development across early childhood.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2026
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

291 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Catherine LebelDepartment of Radiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada; Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute and the Hotchkiss Brain Institute, Calgary, AB, Canada. Electronic address: clebel@ucalgary.ca.
Sean DeoniSchool of Engineering, Providence, RI, United States; Advanced Baby Imaging Lab at Memorial Hospital of Rhode Island, Pawtucket, RI, United States.

Funding

The Developing Brain: Influences and OutcomesUH3OD023313 · OD · WOMEN AND INFANTS HOSPITAL-RHODE ISLAND · PI Viren Andrew D'Sa, Daphne Koinis Mitchell · 2018 to 2026
$20.7M
The Developing Brain: Influences and OutcomesUG3OD023313 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI D'SA, VIREN ANDREW, KOINIS MITCHELL, DAPHNE · 2016 to 2024
$11.6M
Imaging White Matter Maturation During Healthy Brain DevelopmentR01MH087510 · NIMH · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI DEONI, SEAN CL · 2009 to 2013
$2.2M
NIH HHS UG3 OD023313NIH HHS UH3 OD023313NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH087510
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Throughout infancy, childhood, and adolescence, our brains undergo remarkable changes. Processes including myelination and synaptogenesis occur rapidly across the first 2-3 years of life, and ongoing brain remodeling continues into young adulthood. Studies have sought to characterize the patterns of structural brain development, and early studies predominately relied upon gross anatomical measures of brain structure, morphology, and organization. MRI offers the ability to characterize and quantify a range of microstructural aspects of brain tissue that may be more closely related to fundamental neurodevelopmental processes. Techniques such as diffusion, magnetization transfer, relaxometry, and myelin water imaging provide insight into changing cyto- and myeloarchitecture, neuronal density, and structural connectivity. In this review, we focus on the growing body of literature exploiting these MRI techniques to better understand the microstructural changes that occur in brain white matter during maturation. Our review focuses on studies of normative brain development from birth to early adulthood (∼25 years), and places particular emphasis on longitudinal studies and newer techniques that are being used to study microstructural white matter development. All imaging methods demonstrate consistent, rapid microstructural white matter development over the first 3 years of life, suggesting increased myelination and axonal packing. Diffusion studies clearly demonstrate continued white matter maturation during later childhood and adolescence, though the lack of consistent findings in other modalities suggests changes may be mainly due to axonal packing. An emerging literature details differential microstructural development in boys and girls, and connects developmental trajectories to cognitive abilities, behaviour, and/or environmental factors, though the nature of these relationships remains unclear. Future research will need to focus on newer imaging techniques and longitudinal studies to provide more detailed information about microstructural white matter development, particularly in the childhood years.

Indexed as

White MatterAdolescentAdultChildChild, PreschoolHuman DevelopmentHumansInfantMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeuroimagingYoung AdultBrain developmentBrain MRIMyelinationNeuroimagingWhite matter

Identifiers

PMID29305910
PMCPMC6030512

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.