Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29305719›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2018

Factors associated with palliative care referral among patients with advanced cancers: a retrospective analysis of a large Brazilian cohort.

Talita Caroline de Oliveira Valentino, Bianca Sakamoto Ribeiro Paiva, Marco Antonio de Oliveira, David Hui, Carlos Eduardo Paiva

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. How, when, and why individuals with stage IV cancer seen in an outpatient setting are referred to palliative care: a mixed methods study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Talita Caroline de Oliveira ValentinoOncology Post-Graduate Program (Stricto Sensu), Barretos Cancer Hospital, Barretos, São Paulo, Brazil.
Bianca Sakamoto Ribeiro PaivaOncology Post-Graduate Program (Stricto Sensu), Barretos Cancer Hospital, Barretos, São Paulo, Brazil.
Marco Antonio de OliveiraResearch Group on Palliative Care and Health-Related Quality of Life (GPQual), Barretos Cancer Hospital, Barretos, São Paulo, Brazil.
David HuiDepartment of Palliative, Rehabilitation, and Integrative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Carlos Eduardo PaivaOncology Post-Graduate Program (Stricto Sensu), Barretos Cancer Hospital, Barretos, São Paulo, Brazil. caredupai@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of the study is to estimate the proportion of patients who had access to palliative care (PC) and to identify the timing and factors associated with this access.

methodsA retrospective longitudinal study that included patients who died of advanced cancer between the years of 2010 and 2014 was conducted. The proportion of patients who received PC consultations was compared during those years. Sociodemographic and clinical factors, the timing between first PC consultation and death (early, ≥ 3 months; late, < 3 months), and first PC consultation were assessed.

resultsOf the 1284 studied patients, 988 (76.9%) were referred to PC and 839 (65.3%) had a PC consultation. The proportion of patients who received late PC consultation increased between the years 2010 and 2014 (44.2 vs. 60.4%, p = 0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed that younger age (odds ratio (OR) = 0.98, p = 0.016) and gynecologic cancer (OR = 2.17, p = 0.011) were associated with a PC consultation. Upper gastrointestinal tract (GIT) cancer (OR = 2.42, p = 0.001) and hematologic malignancies (OR = 0.37, p = 0.001) were associated with late PC consultations. The median time interval between the first PC consultation and death was 2.66 months: timing differed significantly among cancer subtypes (p = 0.002).

conclusionMost patients received PC consultation before death, and the number of patients with late consultation increased throughout the study. Patients with late referrals could have received PC earlier. The current findings suggest the need to standardize the referral criteria to optimize access to PC.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBrazilCohort StudiesDisease ProgressionFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsPalliative CareQuality of Health CareReferral and ConsultationRetrospective StudiesAdvanced cancerHealth servicesPalliative careQuality of health careReferral and consultation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.