Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29305645›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience2019

Free visual exploration of natural movies in schizophrenia.

Johanna Elisa Silberg, Ioannis Agtzidis, Mikhail Startsev, Teresa Fasshauer, Karen Silling, Andreas Sprenger, Michael Dorr, Rebekka Lencer

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Saccadic suppression in schizophrenia.Scientific reports · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Johanna Elisa SilbergDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Muenster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, Geb. A9, 48149, Muenster, Germany.
Ioannis AgtzidisChair of Human-Machine Communication, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Mikhail StartsevChair of Human-Machine Communication, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Teresa FasshauerDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Muenster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, Geb. A9, 48149, Muenster, Germany.
Karen SillingDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Muenster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, Geb. A9, 48149, Muenster, Germany.
Andreas SprengerDepartment of Neurology and Institute of Psychology II, University of Luebeck, Lübeck, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9255-7911
Michael DorrChair of Human-Machine Communication, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7879-7908
Rebekka LencerDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Muenster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, Geb. A9, 48149, Muenster, Germany. rebekka.lencer@ukmuenster.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4032-7297
Technical University of Munich · DEAugenstern · DEUniversity of Lübeck · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEye tracking dysfunction (ETD) observed with standard pursuit stimuli represents a well-established biomarker for schizophrenia. How ETD may manifest during free visual exploration of real-life movies is unclear.

methodsEye movements were recorded (EyeLink®1000) while 26 schizophrenia patients and 25 healthy age-matched controls freely explored nine uncut movies and nine pictures of real-life situations for 20 s each. Subsequently, participants were shown still shots of these scenes to decide whether they had explored them as movies or pictures. Participants were additionally assessed on standard eye-tracking tasks.

resultsPatients made smaller saccades (movies (p = 0.003), pictures (p = 0.002)) and had a stronger central bias (movies and pictures (p < 0.001)) than controls. In movies, patients' exploration behavior was less driven by image-defined, bottom-up stimulus saliency than controls (p < 0.05). Proportions of pursuit tracking on movies differed between groups depending on the individual movie (group*movie p = 0.011, movie p < 0.001). Eye velocity on standard pursuit stimuli was reduced in patients (p = 0.029) but did not correlate with pursuit behavior on movies. Additionally, patients obtained lower rates of correctly identified still shots as movies or pictures (p = 0.046).

conclusionOur results suggest a restricted centrally focused visual exploration behavior in patients not only on pictures, but also on movies of real-life scenes. While ETD observed in the laboratory cannot be directly transferred to natural viewing conditions, these alterations support a model of impairments in motion information processing in patients resulting in a reduced ability to perceive moving objects and less saliency driven exploration behavior presumably contributing to alterations in the perception of the natural environment.

Indexed as

AdultExploratory BehaviorEye Movement MeasurementsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMotion PerceptionMotion PicturesPattern Recognition, VisualPursuit, SmoothSchizophreniaDynamic scenesSaliencySchizophreniaSmooth pursuit eye movementsVisual exploration patternVisual processing

Identifiers

PMID29305645
OpenAlexW2781730821

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.