Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29305587›Full record

ArticleCell death and differentiation2018

Consensus molecular subtypes of colorectal cancer are recapitulated in in vitro and in vivo models.

Janneke F Linnekamp, Sander R van Hooff, Pramudita R Prasetyanti, Raju Kandimalla, Joyce Y Buikhuisen, Evelyn Fessler, Prashanthi Ramesh, Kelly A S T Lee, Grehor G W Bochove, Johan H de Jong and 11 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell death and differentiation, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 120 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
120citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

120 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Clinical Challenges of Consensus Molecular Subtype CMS4 Colon Cancer in the Era of Precision Medicine.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2024
    Review

60 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Janneke F LinnekampCancer Center Amsterdam, Laboratory of Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology (LEXOR), CEMM, Academic Medical Center, Meibergdreef 9, 1105AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Sander R van HooffCancer Center Amsterdam, Laboratory of Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology (LEXOR), CEMM, Academic Medical Center, Meibergdreef 9, 1105AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Pramudita R PrasetyantiCancer Center Amsterdam, Laboratory of Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology (LEXOR), CEMM, Academic Medical Center, Meibergdreef 9, 1105AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Raju KandimallaCancer Center Amsterdam, Laboratory of Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology (LEXOR), CEMM, Academic Medical Center, Meibergdreef 9, 1105AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Joyce Y BuikhuisenCancer Center Amsterdam, Laboratory of Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology (LEXOR), CEMM, Academic Medical Center, Meibergdreef 9, 1105AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Evelyn FesslerCancer Center Amsterdam, Laboratory of Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology (LEXOR), CEMM, Academic Medical Center, Meibergdreef 9, 1105AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Prashanthi RameshCancer Center Amsterdam, Laboratory of Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology (LEXOR), CEMM, Academic Medical Center, Meibergdreef 9, 1105AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Kelly A S T LeeCancer Center Amsterdam, Laboratory of Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology (LEXOR), CEMM, Academic Medical Center, Meibergdreef 9, 1105AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Grehor G W BochoveCancer Center Amsterdam, Laboratory of Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology (LEXOR), CEMM, Academic Medical Center, Meibergdreef 9, 1105AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Johan H de JongCancer Center Amsterdam, Laboratory of Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology (LEXOR), CEMM, Academic Medical Center, Meibergdreef 9, 1105AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Kate CameronCancer Center Amsterdam, Laboratory of Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology (LEXOR), CEMM, Academic Medical Center, Meibergdreef 9, 1105AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Ronald van LeersumCancer Center Amsterdam, Laboratory of Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology (LEXOR), CEMM, Academic Medical Center, Meibergdreef 9, 1105AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Hans M RodermondCancer Center Amsterdam, Laboratory of Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology (LEXOR), CEMM, Academic Medical Center, Meibergdreef 9, 1105AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Marek FranitzaCologne Center for Genomics (CCG), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Peter NürnbergCologne Center for Genomics (CCG), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Laura R MangiapaneCellular and Molecular Pathophysiology Laboratory, Department of Surgical and Oncological Sciences, University of Palermo, Via del Vespro 131, Palermo, 90134, Italy.
Xin WangDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong.
Hans CleversCancer Genomics Netherlands, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Louis VermeulenCancer Center Amsterdam, Laboratory of Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology (LEXOR), CEMM, Academic Medical Center, Meibergdreef 9, 1105AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6066-789X
Giorgio StassiCellular and Molecular Pathophysiology Laboratory, Department of Surgical and Oncological Sciences, University of Palermo, Via del Vespro 131, Palermo, 90134, Italy.
Jan Paul MedemaCancer Center Amsterdam, Laboratory of Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology (LEXOR), CEMM, Academic Medical Center, Meibergdreef 9, 1105AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. j.p.medema@amc.nl.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a highly heterogeneous disease both from a molecular and clinical perspective. Several distinct molecular entities, such as microsatellite instability (MSI), have been defined that make up biologically distinct subgroups with their own clinical course. Recent data indicated that CRC can be best segregated into four groups called consensus molecular subtypes (CMS1-4), each of which has a unique biology and gene expression pattern. In order to develop improved, subtype-specific therapies and to gain insight into the molecular wiring and origin of these subtypes, reliable models are needed. This study was designed to determine the heterogeneity and identify the presence of CMSs in a large panel of CRC cell lines, primary cultures and patient-derived xenografts (PDX). We provide a repository encompassing this heterogeneity and moreover describe that a large part of the models can be robustly assigned to one of the four CMSs, independent of the stromal contribution. We subsequently validate our CMS stratification by functional analysis which for instance shows mesenchymal enrichment in CMS4 and metabolic dysregulation in CMS3. Finally, we observe a clear difference in sensitivity to chemotherapy-induced apoptosis, specifically between CMS2 and CMS4. This relates to the in vivo efficacy of chemotherapy, which delays outgrowth of CMS2, but not CMS4 xenografts. Combined our data indicate that molecular subtypes are faithfully modelled in CRC cell cultures and PDXs, representing tumour cell intrinsic and stable features. This repository provides researchers with a platform to study CRC using the existing heterogeneity.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalAnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsApoptosisBiomarkers, TumorCell DifferentiationCell ProliferationColorectal NeoplasmsDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug Screening Assays, AntitumorFluorouracilGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansMiceMice, NudeAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, TumorFluorouracilOxaliplatin

Identifiers

PMID29305587
PMCPMC5864202

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.