Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29305425›Full record

ArticleBone & joint research2018

A systematic review of current osteoporotic metaphyseal fracture animal models.

R M Y Wong, M H V Choy, M C M Li, K-S Leung, S K-H Chow, W-H Cheung, J C Y Cheng

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bone & joint research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Impact of osteoporosis and osteoporosis medications on fracture healing: a narrative review.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. A modified method for constructing experimental rat periodontitis model.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

R M Y WongDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Prince of Wales Hospital Authority, 30-32 Ngan Shing Street, Shatin, Hong Kong and Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong.
M H V ChoyDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong.
M C M LiDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong.
K-S LeungDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Prince of Wales Hospital Authority, 30-32 Ngan Shing Street, Shatin, Hong Kong and Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong.
S K-H ChowDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong.
W-H CheungDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong Louis@ort.cuhk.edu.hk.
J C Y ChengDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong.
Chinese University of Hong Kong · CNHospital Authority · CNPrince of Wales Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe treatment of osteoporotic fractures is a major challenge, and the enhancement of healing is critical as a major goal in modern fracture management. Most osteoporotic fractures occur at the metaphyseal bone region but few models exist and the healing is still poorly understood. A systematic review was conducted to identify and analyse the appropriateness of current osteoporotic metaphyseal fracture animal models. MATERIALS AND

methodsA literature search was performed on the Pubmed, Embase, and Web of Science databases, and relevant articles were selected. A total of 19 studies were included. Information on the animal, induction of osteoporosis, fracture technique, site and fixation, healing results, and utility of the model were extracted.

resultsFracture techniques included drill hole defects (3 of 19), bone defects (3 of 19), partial osteotomy (1 of 19), and complete osteotomies (12 of 19). Drill hole models and incomplete osteotomy models are easy to perform and allow the study of therapeutic agents but do not represent the usual clinical setting. Additionally, biomaterials can be filled into drill hole defects for analysis. Complete osteotomy models are most commonly used and are best suited for the investigation of therapeutic drugs or noninvasive interventions. The metaphyseal defect models allow the study of biomaterials, which are associated with complex and comminuted osteoporotic fractures.

conclusionFor a clinically relevant model, we propose that an animal model should satisfy the following criteria to study osteoporotic fracture healing: 1) induction of osteoporosis, 2) complete osteotomy or defect at the metaphysis unilaterally, and 3) internal fixation.

Indexed as

Animal ModelMetaphyseal FractureOsteoporosisSystematic Review

Identifiers

PMID29305425
PMCPMC5805822
OpenAlexW2782245182

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.