Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29304862›Full record

Trial reportThe international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity2018

Cluster randomized controlled trial of a mobile market intervention to increase fruit and vegetable intake among adults in lower-income communities in North Carolina.

Lucia A Leone, Gina L Tripicchio, Lindsey Haynes-Maslow, Jared McGuirt, Jacqueline S Grady Smith, Janelle Armstrong-Brown, Ziya Gizlice, Alice Ammerman

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03026608 (Impact of a Public-Private Mobile Market to Improve Fruit & Vegetable Access), which is not on this map. Cited by 30 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03026608 nacompletednot on this map

Impact of a Public-Private Mobile Market to Improve Fruit & Vegetable Access

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of North Carolina, Chapel HillRan2012 to 2016Enrolled201ConditionsFruit and Vegetable Consumption, Food InsecurityArmsVeggie Van Program
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Lucia A LeoneDepartment of Community Health and Health Behavior, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA. lucialeo@buffalo.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-3775-336X
Gina L TripicchioCenter for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Lindsey Haynes-MaslowDepartment of Agricultural and Human Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA.
Jared McGuirtCenter for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Jacqueline S Grady SmithCenter for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Janelle Armstrong-BrownRTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
Ziya GizliceCenter for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Alice AmmermanCenter for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.

Funding

UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CLINICAL NUTRITION RESEARCH UNITP30DK056350 · NIDDK · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Ian Michael Carroll · 1999 to 2026
$31.6M
Cancer Health Disparities Training ProgramT32CA128582 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI ENG, EUGENIA, TATE, DEBORAH F. · 2009 to 2023
$3.4M
Research Training:Health Care Quality &Patient OutcomesT32NR008856 · NINR · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI MARK, BARBARA A · 2004 to 2013
$2.7M
Impact of a Public-Private Mobile Market to Improve Fruit & Vegetable AccessR21CA173042 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI AMMERMAN, ALICE S · 2012 to 2014
$482k
NCI NIH HHS 1R21CA173042NCI NIH HHS 1T32CA128582NCI NIH HHS R21 CA173042NCI NIH HHS T32 CA128582NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK056350NINR NIH HHS 2T32NR008856NINR NIH HHS T32 NR008856
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPoorer diets and subsequent higher rates of chronic disease among lower-income individuals may be partially attributed to reduced access to fresh fruits and vegetables (F&V) and other healthy foods. Mobile markets are an increasingly popular method for providing access to F&V in underserved communities, but evaluation efforts are limited. The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of Veggie Van (VV), a mobile produce market, on F&V intake in lower-income communities using a group randomized controlled trial.

methodsVV is a mobile produce market that sells reduced-cost locally grown produce and offers nutrition and cooking education. We recruited 12 sites in lower-income communities in North Carolina (USA) to host VV, randomizing them to receive VV immediately (intervention) or after the 6-month study period (delayed intervention control). Participants at each site completed baseline and follow-up surveys including F&V intake, perceived access to fresh F&V and self-efficacy for purchasing, preparing and eating F&V. We used multiple linear regression to calculate adjusted differences in outcomes while controlling for baseline values, education and clustering within site.

resultsAmong 142 participants who completed the follow-up, baseline F&V intake was 3.48 cups/day for control and 3.33 for intervention. At follow-up, adjusted change in F&V consumption was 0.95 cups/day greater for intervention participants (p = 0.005), but was attenuated to 0.51 cups per day (p = 0.11) after removing extreme values. VV customers increased their F&V consumption by 0.41 cups/day (n = 30) compared to a 0.25 cups/day decrease for 111 non-customers (p = 0.04). Intervention participants did not show significant improvements in perceived access to fresh F&V, but increased their self-efficacy for working more F&V into snacks (p = 0.02), making up a vegetable dish with what they had on hand (p = 0.03), and cooking vegetables in a way that is appealing to their family (p = 0.048).

conclusionsMobile markets may help improve F&V intake in lower-income communities.

trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov ID# NCT03026608 retrospectively registered January 2, 2017.

Indexed as

Consumer BehaviorDietFeeding BehaviorMarketingPovertyProgram EvaluationAdultCookingFemaleFruitHealth BehaviorHealth PromotionHumansMaleMiddle AgedNorth CarolinaCluster-randomized trialFood environmentFruits and vegetablesLower-incomeMobile market

Identifiers

PMID29304862
PMCPMC5756418

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.