Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29304817›Full record

ArticleHealth and quality of life outcomes2018

Catquest-9SF questionnaire: validation of Malay and Chinese-language versions using Rasch analysis.

Tassha Hilda Adnan, Mokhlisoh Mohamed Apandi, Haireen Kamaruddin, Mohamad Aziz Salowi, Kian Boon Law, Jamaiyah Haniff, Pik Pin Goh

Open access · goldAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Health and quality of life outcomes, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Tassha Hilda AdnanNational Clinical Research Centre, Kuala Lumpur Hospital, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. tassha@crc.gov.my.
Mokhlisoh Mohamed ApandiOphthalmology Department, Selayang Hospital, Batu Caves, Selangor, Malaysia.
Haireen KamaruddinOphthalmology Department, Selayang Hospital, Batu Caves, Selangor, Malaysia.
Mohamad Aziz SalowiOphthalmology Department, Selayang Hospital, Batu Caves, Selangor, Malaysia.
Kian Boon LawClinical Research Centre, Ampang Hospital, Ampang, Selangor, Malaysia.
Jamaiyah HaniffNational Clinical Research Centre, Kuala Lumpur Hospital, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Pik Pin GohNational Clinical Research Centre, Kuala Lumpur Hospital, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Hospital Kuala Lumpur · MYHospital Selayang · MYKPJ Ampang Puteri Specialist Hospital · MYSultan Zainal Abidin University · MY

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCatquest questionnaire was originally developed in Swedish to measure patients' self-assessed visual function to evaluate the benefit of cataract surgery. The result of the Rasch analysis leading to the creation of the nine-item short form of Catquest, (Catquest-9SF), and it had been translated and validated in English. The aim is therefore to evaluate the translated Catquest-9SF questionnaire in Malay and Chinese (Mandarin) language version for measuring patient-reported visual function among cataract population in Malaysia.

methodsThe English version of Catquest-9SF questionnaire was translated and back translated into Malay and Chinese languages. The Malay and Chinese translated versions were self-administered by 236 and 202 pre-operative patients drawn from a cataract surgery waiting list, respectively. The translated Catquest-9SF data and its four response options were assessed for fit to the Rasch model.

resultsThe Catquest-9SF performed well in the Malay and Chinese translated versions fulfilling all criteria for valid measurement, as demonstrated by Rasch analysis. Both versions of questionnaire had ordered response thresholds, with a good person separation (Malay 2.84; and Chinese 2.59) and patient separation reliability (Malay 0.89; Chinese 0.87). Targeting was 0.30 and -0.11 logits in Malay and Chinese versions respectively, indicating that the item difficulty was well suited to the visual abilities of the patients. All items fit a single overall construct (Malay infit range 0.85-1.26, outfit range 0.73-1.13; Chinese infit range 0.80-1.51, outfit range 0.71-1.36), unidimensional by principal components analysis, and was free of Differential Item Functioning (DIF).

conclusionsThese results support the good overall functioning of the Catquest-9SF in patients with cataract. The translated questionnaire to Malay and Chinese-language versions are reliable and valid in measuring visual disability outcomes in the Malaysian cataract population.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeActivities of Daily LivingAgedCataractFemaleHumansMalaysiaMaleMiddle AgedOutcome Assessment, Health CareReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesTranslationsVision, OcularCatquest-9SF questionnaireRasch analysisValidation

Identifiers

PMID29304817
PMCPMC5755437
OpenAlexW2782314007

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.