Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29304812›Full record

ArticleReproductive health2018

The CRADLE vital signs alert: qualitative evaluation of a novel device designed for use in pregnancy by healthcare workers in low-resource settings.

Hannah L Nathan, Helena Boene, Khatia Munguambe, Esperança Sevene, David Akeju, Olalekan O Adetoro, Umesh Charanthimath, Mrutyunjaya B Bellad, Annemarie de Greeff, John Anthony and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Reproductive health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Obstetrics and gynecology devices designed for low- and middle-income countries: A narrative review.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 8 institutions in 6 countries.

Hannah L NathanDepartment of Women and Children's Health, King's College London, London, UK. hannah.nathan@kcl.ac.uk.
Helena BoeneCentro de Investigação em Saúde da Manhiça (CISM), Vila da Manhiça, Moçambique.
Khatia MunguambeCentro de Investigação em Saúde da Manhiça (CISM), Vila da Manhiça, Moçambique.
Esperança SeveneCentro de Investigação em Saúde da Manhiça (CISM), Vila da Manhiça, Moçambique.
David AkejuDepartment of Sociology, University of Lagos, Lagos, Nigeria.
Olalekan O AdetoroCentre for Reproductive Health, Sagamu, Ogun State, Nigeria.
Umesh CharanthimathKLE University's Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Belgaum, Karnataka, India.
Mrutyunjaya B BelladKLE University's Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Belgaum, Karnataka, India.
Annemarie de GreeffDepartment of Women and Children's Health, King's College London, London, UK.
John AnthonyMaternity Centre, Groote Schuur Hospital, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
David R HallDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Tygerberg Hospital, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa.
Wilhelm SteynDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Tygerberg Hospital, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa.
Marianne VidlerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, and the Child and Family Research Institute, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Peter von DadelszenDepartment of Women and Children's Health, King's College London, London, UK.
Lucy C ChappellDepartment of Women and Children's Health, King's College London, London, UK.
Jane SandallDepartment of Women and Children's Health, King's College London, London, UK.
Andrew H ShennanDepartment of Women and Children's Health, King's College London, London, UK.
CLIP Working Group
King's College London · GBEduardo Mondlane University · MZJawaharlal Nehru Medical College · INUniversity of British Columbia · CAUniversity of Cape Town · ZAManhiça Health Research Centre · MZStellenbosch University · ZAUniversity of Lagos · NG

Funding

Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation OPP1086183Department of Health RP-2014-05-019Medical Research Council MR/N006240/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVital signs measurement can identify pregnant and postpartum women who require urgent treatment or referral. In low-resource settings, healthcare workers have limited access to accurate vital signs measuring devices suitable for their environment and training. The CRADLE Vital Signs Alert (VSA) is a novel device measuring blood pressure and pulse that is accurate in pregnancy and designed for low-resource settings. Its traffic light early warning system alerts healthcare workers to the need for escalation of care for women with hypertension, haemorrhage or sepsis. This study evaluated the usability and acceptability of the CRADLE VSA device.

methodsEvaluation was conducted in community and primary care settings in India, Mozambique and Nigeria and tertiary hospitals in South Africa. Purposeful sampling was used to convene 155 interviews and six focus groups with healthcare workers using the device (n = 205) and pregnant women and their family members (n = 41). Interviews and focus groups were conducted in the local language and audio-recorded, transcribed and translated into English for analysis. Thematic analysis was undertaken using an a priori thematic framework, as well as an inductive approach.

resultsMost healthcare workers perceived the CRADLE device to be easy to use and accurate. The traffic lights early warning system was unanimously reported positively, giving healthcare workers confidence with decision-making and a sense of professionalism. However, a minority in South Africa described manual inflation as tiring, particularly when measuring vital signs in obese and hypertensive women (n = 4) and a few South African healthcare workers distrusted the device's accuracy (n = 7). Unanimously, pregnant women liked the CRADLE device. The traffic light early warning system gave women and their families a better understanding of the importance of vital signs in pregnancy and during the postpartum period.

conclusionThe CRADLE device was well accepted by healthcare workers from a range of countries and levels of facility, including those with no previous vital signs measurement experience. The device motivated women to attend primary care and encouraged them to accept treatment and referral.

Indexed as

Maternal Health ServicesVital SignsAdultCommunity Health ServicesCommunity Health WorkersEarly DiagnosisEquipment and SuppliesEquipment DesignFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansIndiaMonitoring, PhysiologicMozambiqueNigeriaPoverty AreasAccuracyBlood pressureEarly warning systemHaemorrhageLow- and middle-income countriesPre-eclampsiaPregnancyQualitative methodsSepsisVital signs

Identifiers

PMID29304812
PMCPMC5756409
OpenAlexW2781760266

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.