Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29304209›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy2018

Tolerability profile of the current antifungal armoury.

Ahmad Mourad, John R Perfect

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Population differentiation, antifungal susceptibility, and host range of Trichophyton mentagrophytes isolates causing recalcitrant infections in humans and animals.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Pre-Existing Liver Disease and Toxicity of Antifungals.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ahmad MouradDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
John R PerfectDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.

Funding

Pathobiology of C. neoformans in the Central Nervous SystemR01AI073896 · NIAID · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI PERFECT, JOHN R. · 2008 to 2018
$4.4M
Evolution of Cryptococcus neoformans Strains from Patients with HIV/AIDSR01AI093257 · NIAID · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI PERFECT, JOHN R. · 2011 to 2022
$3.8M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI073896NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI093257
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The tolerability of available antifungal agents is essential to the final outcome of the management of invasive mycoses. There are limited classes of antifungal agents for use, and they can have serious direct toxicities and/or drug-drug interactions. In this review, we examine the common toxicities noted for antifungal agents and attempt to both identify the issues around the adverse events and provide clinical context for their occurrence in these fragile patients.

Indexed as

Antifungal AgentsDisease ManagementDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsHumansInvasive Fungal InfectionsAntifungal Agents

Identifiers

PMID29304209
PMCPMC6636388

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.