Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29304203›Full record

ArticleThe journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences2020

Primary Caregivers in a Network Context.

Christopher Steven Marcum, Sato Ashida, Laura M Koehly

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Evolution of shared care networks by race and ethnicity: findings from the National Health and Aging Trends Study.The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Sharing in Caring: Family Caregiving Task-Sharing Patterns for Older Adults in Singapore.The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Conceptualizing and Operationalizing Collaboration Among Multiple Caregivers of Older Adults.The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Links of we-talk to caregiver social network systems and health.Journal of family psychology : JFP : journal of the Division of Family Psychology of the American Psychological Association (Division 43) · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Christopher Steven MarcumNational Institutes of Health, National Human Genome Research Institute, Social Behavioral Research Branch, Social Network Methods Section, Bethesda, Maryland.
Sato AshidaCollege of Public Health, Community and Behavioral Health, University of Iowa, Iowa City.
Laura M KoehlyNational Institutes of Health, National Human Genome Research Institute, Social Behavioral Research Branch, Social Network Methods Section, Bethesda, Maryland.
National Human Genome Research Institute · USUniversity of Iowa · US

Funding

Inherited Disease, Caregiving, and Social NetworksZIAHG200395 · NHGRI · NATIONAL HUMAN GENOME RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI KOEHLY, LAURA M · 2015 to 2025
$11.2M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA HG200395
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesCaregiving to individuals affected by Alzheimer's disease and related dementia (ADRD) is a family-systems process where tasks are distributed between multiple caregivers in a network. We evaluate the extent to which multiple network members nominate one another as filling primary caregiver (PCG) roles and factors associated with nomination.

methodData come from the Caregiving Roles and Expectations Networks project, which aimed to characterize the caregiving networks of families affected by ADRD. All persons affected by ADRD were either full-time residents in residential care facilities or community-dwelling adult day-care participants. Generalized Poisson regression was used to model the count of incoming PCG nominations of each network member.

resultsOn average, there were multiple network members identified as PCGs across different network contexts. Network members who were perceived to perform essential caregiving tasks, such as making decisions on behalf of and spending time with the care recipient, received more primary caregiving nominations from their network peers, adjusting for personal attributes, and the context of care. DISCUSSION: Having multiple PCGs in a network may result in lack of consensus in who fills those roles, potentially putting families at risk for interpersonal conflicts. Future work aimed at intervention development should fully assess the social contexts surrounding caregiving processes in order to better understand how network composition might impact outcomes.

Indexed as

FamilySocial NetworkingAdultAdult Day Care CentersAftercareAgedAged, 80 and overAlzheimer DiseaseAssisted Living FacilitiesCaregiversDementiaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedAlzheimer’s diseaseCaregivingSocial networks

Identifiers

PMID29304203
PMCPMC7179806
OpenAlexW2781766549

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.