Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29304175›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Genome scale metabolic models as tools for drug design and personalized medicine.

Vytautas Raškevičius, Valeryia Mikalayeva, Ieva Antanavičiūtė, Ieva Ceslevičienė, Vytenis Arvydas Skeberdis, Visvaldas Kairys, Sergio Bordel

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Unveiling new features of the human pathogenComputational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Vytautas RaškevičiusInstitute of Cardiology, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania.
Valeryia MikalayevaInstitute of Cardiology, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania.ORCID 0000-0003-2848-816X
Ieva AntanavičiūtėInstitute of Cardiology, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania.
Ieva CeslevičienėInstitute of Cardiology, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania.ORCID 0000-0002-7276-8081
Vytenis Arvydas SkeberdisInstitute of Cardiology, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania.
Visvaldas KairysDepartment of Bioinformatics, Institute of Biotechnology, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania.ORCID 0000-0002-5427-0175
Sergio BordelInstitute of Cardiology, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania.
Lithuanian University of Health Sciences · LTUniversidad de Valladolid · ESVilnius University · LT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this work we aim to show how Genome Scale Metabolic Models (GSMMs) can be used as tools for drug design. By comparing the chemical structures of human metabolites (obtained using their KEGG indexes) and the compounds contained in the DrugBank database, we have observed that compounds showing Tanimoto scores higher than 0.9 with a metabolite, are 29.5 times more likely to bind the enzymes metabolizing the considered metabolite, than ligands chosen randomly. By using RNA-seq data to constrain a human GSMM it is possible to obtain an estimation of its distribution of metabolic fluxes and to quantify the effects of restraining the rate of chosen metabolic reactions (for example using a drug that inhibits the enzymes catalyzing the mentioned reactions). This method allowed us to predict the differential effects of lipoamide analogs on the proliferation of MCF7 (a breast cancer cell line) and ASM (airway smooth muscle) cells respectively. These differential effects were confirmed experimentally, which provides a proof of concept of how human GSMMs could be used to find therapeutic windows against cancer. By using RNA-seq data of 34 different cancer cell lines and 26 healthy tissues, we assessed the putative anticancer effects of the compounds in DrugBank which are structurally similar to human metabolites. Among other results it was predicted that the mevalonate pathway might constitute a good therapeutic window against cancer proliferation, due to the fact that most cancer cell lines do not express the cholesterol transporter NPC1L1 and the lipoprotein lipase LPL, which makes them rely on the mevalonate pathway to obtain cholesterol.

Indexed as

Drug DesignGenome, HumanModels, BiologicalPrecision MedicineCells, CulturedHumansLigandsMCF-7 CellsSequence Analysis, RNALigands

Identifiers

PMID29304175
PMCPMC5755790
OpenAlexW2782152611

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.