Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29304159›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Invasion strategies in round goby (Neogobius melanostomus): Is bigger really better?

Joerg Brandner, Alexander F Cerwenka, Ulrich K Schliewen, Juergen Geist

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Round Goby (Biological invasions · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Joerg BrandnerWasserwirtschaftsamt Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Alexander F CerwenkaAquatic Systems Biology Unit, Technical University of Munich, School of Life Sciences Weihenstephan, Freising, Germany.
Ulrich K SchliewenSNSB-Bavarian State Collection of Zoology (ZSM), München, Germany.
Juergen GeistAquatic Systems Biology Unit, Technical University of Munich, School of Life Sciences Weihenstephan, Freising, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7698-3443

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Few studies have systematically investigated mid- or long-term temporal changes of biological characteristics in invasive alien species considering the different phases of an invasion. We studied the invasion performance of one of the most invasive species worldwide, the round goby Neogobius melanostomus, from total absence over first occurrence until establishment from 2010 to 2015 in the upper Danube River. After an upstream movement of the invasion front of about 30 river km within four years, the pattern that round goby pioneering populations significantly differ from longer established ones has been confirmed: Pioneering populations at the invasion front comprised more females than males, and adult specimens with a larger body size compared to those at longer inhabited areas. On the population-level, the proportion of juveniles increased with time since invasion. The results of this study provide support for the previously postulated ´bigger is better´ and ´individual trait utility´ hypotheses explaining invasion success in round goby. Pioneering invaders with their greater exploratory behavior, highly adaptive phenotypic plasticity and increased competitive ability seem to act as prime emperors of new habitats, strongly following and benefiting from man-made river-bank structures.

Indexed as

Introduced SpeciesPerciformesRiversAge FactorsAnimalsBody SizeEuropeExploratory BehaviorFemaleMalePhenotypePopulation DynamicsSex Factors

Identifiers

PMID29304159
PMCPMC5755910

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.