ArticlePloS one2018
The use of automated Ki67 analysis to predict Oncotype DX risk-of-recurrence categories in early-stage breast cancer.
Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
35 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence for breast cancer management.Communications medicine · 2026Review
- Oncotype DX Recurrence Score and Germline BRCA Variants in Patients with HR-Positive/HER2-Negative Early Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Observational Study.Oncology and therapy · 2025Article
- Harnessing artificial intelligence for predicting breast cancer recurrence: a systematic review of clinical and imaging data.Discover oncology · 2025Review
- The role of artificial intelligence in enhancing breast cancer screening and diagnosis: A review of current advances.BioImpacts : BI · 2025Review
- Advancing Ki67 hotspot detection in breast cancer: a comparative analysis of automated digital image analysis algorithms.Histopathology · 2025Article
- The REMAR (Rhein-Main-Registry) real-world study: prospective evaluation of the 21-gene breast recurrence score® assay in addition to Ki-67 for adjuvant treatment decisions in early-stage breast cancer.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2024Article
- The Ki67 dilemma: investigating prognostic cut-offs and reproducibility for automated Ki67 scoring in breast cancer.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2024Article
- Prediction of Oncotype DX Recurrence Score Based on Systematic Evaluation of Ki-67 Scores in Hormone Receptor-Positive Early Breast Cancer.Journal of breast cancer · 2024Article
- Identification of Patients with Early HR+ HER2- Breast Cancer at High Risk of Recurrence.Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde · 2024Article
- Association Between Ki-67 Proliferative Index and Oncotype-Dx Recurrence Score in Hormone Receptor-Positive, HER2-Negative Early Breast Cancers. A Systematic Review of the Literature.Breast cancer : basic and clinical research · 2024Review
- Evaluation of the international Ki67 working group cut point recommendations for early breast cancer: comparison with 21-gene assay results in a large integrated health care system.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2024Article
- The Approach of Artificial Intelligence in Neuroendocrine Carcinomas of the Breast: A Next Step towards Precision Pathology?-A Case Report and Review of the Literature.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023Review
- The Evolution of Ki-67 and Breast Carcinoma: Past Observations, Present Directions, and Future Considerations.Cancers · 2023Review
- MCM-2 Levels as a Potential Biomarker for Predicting High-Risk Breast Cancer Patients According to TAILORx Classification.Breast cancer (Dove Medical Press) · 2023Article
- Concordance between Ki-67 index in invasive breast cancer and molecular signatures: EndoPredict and MammaPrint.Molecular and clinical oncology · 2022Article
- A Novel Surrogate Nomogram Capable of Predicting OncotypeDX Recurrence Score©.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Article
- The Role of the 21-Gene Recurrence ScoreCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2022Review
- Biomarker discovery studies for patient stratification using machine learning analysis of omics data: a scoping review.BMJ open · 2021Article
- Shifting Gears in Precision Oncology-Challenges and Opportunities of Integrative Data Analysis.Biomolecules · 2021Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ki67 is a commonly used marker of cancer cell proliferation, and has significant prognostic value in breast cancer. In spite of its clinical importance, assessment of Ki67 remains a challenge, as current manual scoring methods have high inter- and intra-user variability. A major reason for this variability is selection bias, in that different observers will score different regions of the same tumor. Here, we developed an automated Ki67 scoring method that eliminates selection bias, by using whole-slide analysis to identify and score the tumor regions with the highest proliferative rates. The Ki67 indices calculated using this method were highly concordant with manual scoring by a pathologist (Pearson's r = 0.909) and between users (Pearson's r = 0.984). We assessed the clinical validity of this method by scoring Ki67 from 328 whole-slide sections of resected early-stage, hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative breast cancer. All patients had Oncotype DX testing performed (Genomic Health) and available Recurrence Scores. High Ki67 indices correlated significantly with several clinico-pathological correlates, including higher tumor grade (1 versus 3, P<0.001), higher mitotic score (1 versus 3, P<0.001), and lower Allred scores for estrogen and progesterone receptors (P = 0.002, 0.008). High Ki67 indices were also significantly correlated with higher Oncotype DX risk-of-recurrence group (low versus high, P<0.001). Ki67 index was the major contributor to a machine learning model which, when trained solely on clinico-pathological data and Ki67 scores, identified Oncotype DX high- and low-risk patients with 97% accuracy, 98% sensitivity and 80% specificity. Automated scoring of Ki67 can thus successfully address issues of consistency, reproducibility and accuracy, in a manner that integrates readily into the workflow of a pathology laboratory. Furthermore, automated Ki67 scores contribute significantly to models that predict risk of recurrence in breast cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.