Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29304135›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Simple reaction times to cyclopean stimuli reveal that the binocular system is tuned to react faster to near than to far objects.

Gábor Horváth, Vanda A Nemes, János Radó, András Czigler, Béla Török, Péter Buzás, Gábor Jandó

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Validation of dynamic random dot stereotests in pediatric vision screening.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2019
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Gábor HorváthInstitute of Physiology, University of Pécs Medical School, Pécs, Hungary.
Vanda A NemesInstitute of Physiology, University of Pécs Medical School, Pécs, Hungary.
János RadóInstitute of Physiology, University of Pécs Medical School, Pécs, Hungary.
András CziglerInstitute of Physiology, University of Pécs Medical School, Pécs, Hungary.
Béla TörökDepartment of Ophthalmology, Kantonsspital, St. Gallen, Switzerland.
Péter BuzásInstitute of Physiology, University of Pécs Medical School, Pécs, Hungary.
Gábor JandóInstitute of Physiology, University of Pécs Medical School, Pécs, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0002-3809-890X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Binocular depth perception is an important mechanism to segregate the visual scene for mapping relevant objects in our environment. Convergent evidence from psychophysical and neurophysiological studies have revealed asymmetries between the processing of near (crossed) and far (uncrossed) binocular disparities. The aim of the present study was to test if near or far objects are processed faster and with higher contrast sensitivity in the visual system. We therefore measured the relationship between binocular disparity and simple reaction time (RT) as well as contrast gain based on the contrast-RT function in young healthy adults. RTs were measured to suddenly appearing cyclopean target stimuli, which were checkerboard patterns encoded by depth in dynamic random dot stereograms (DRDS). The DRDS technique allowed us to selectively study the stereoscopic processing system by eliminating all monocular cues. The results showed that disparity and contrast had significant effects on RTs. RTs as a function of disparity followed a U-shaped tuning curve indicating an optimum at around 15 arc min, where RTs were minimal. Surprisingly, the disparity tuning of RT was much less pronounced for far disparities. At the optimal disparity, we measured advantages of about 80 ms and 30 ms for near disparities at low (10%) and high (90%) contrasts, respectively. High contrast always reduced RTs as well as the disparity dependent differences. Furthermore, RT-based contrast gains were higher for near disparities in the range of disparities where RTs were the shortest. These results show that the sensitivity of the human visual system is biased for near versus far disparities and near stimuli can result in faster motor responses, probably because they bear higher biological relevance.

Indexed as

AdultContrast SensitivityDepth PerceptionFemaleHumansMalePhotic StimulationPsychophysicsReaction TimeVision, BinocularVision DisparityYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID29304135
PMCPMC5755738

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.