Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29304112›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

A complex network approach reveals a pivotal substructure of genes linked to schizophrenia.

Alfonso Monaco, Anna Monda, Nicola Amoroso, Alessandro Bertolino, Giuseppe Blasi, Pasquale Di Carlo, Marco Papalino, Giulio Pergola, Sabina Tangaro, Roberto Bellotti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Transcriptomic context ofProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Alfonso MonacoIstituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare (INFN), Sezione di Bari, Via A. Orabona 4, 70125 Bari, Italy.
Anna MondaDepartment of Basic Medical Science, Neuroscience, and Sense Organs, University of Bari, Piazza G. Cesare 11, 70124 Bari, Italy.
Nicola AmorosoIstituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare (INFN), Sezione di Bari, Via A. Orabona 4, 70125 Bari, Italy.
Alessandro BertolinoDepartment of Basic Medical Science, Neuroscience, and Sense Organs, University of Bari, Piazza G. Cesare 11, 70124 Bari, Italy.
Giuseppe BlasiDepartment of Basic Medical Science, Neuroscience, and Sense Organs, University of Bari, Piazza G. Cesare 11, 70124 Bari, Italy.
Pasquale Di CarloDepartment of Basic Medical Science, Neuroscience, and Sense Organs, University of Bari, Piazza G. Cesare 11, 70124 Bari, Italy.
Marco PapalinoDepartment of Basic Medical Science, Neuroscience, and Sense Organs, University of Bari, Piazza G. Cesare 11, 70124 Bari, Italy.
Giulio PergolaDepartment of Basic Medical Science, Neuroscience, and Sense Organs, University of Bari, Piazza G. Cesare 11, 70124 Bari, Italy.
Sabina TangaroIstituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare (INFN), Sezione di Bari, Via A. Orabona 4, 70125 Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1372-3916
Roberto BellottiIstituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare (INFN), Sezione di Bari, Via A. Orabona 4, 70125 Bari, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Research on brain disorders with a strong genetic component and complex heritability, such as schizophrenia, has led to the development of brain transcriptomics. This field seeks to gain a deeper understanding of gene expression, a key factor in exploring further research issues. Our study focused on how genes are associated amongst each other. In this perspective, we have developed a novel data-driven strategy for characterizing genetic modules, i.e., clusters of strongly interacting genes. The aim was to uncover a pivotal community of genes linked to a target gene for schizophrenia. Our approach combined network topological properties with information theory to highlight the presence of a pivotal community, for a specific gene, and to simultaneously assess the information content of partitions with the Shannon's entropy based on betweenness. We analyzed the publicly available BrainCloud dataset containing post-mortem gene expression data and focused on the Dopamine D2 receptor, encoded by the DRD2 gene. We used four different community detection algorithms to evaluate the consistence of our approach. A pivotal DRD2 community emerged for all the procedures applied, with a considerable reduction in size, compared to the initial network. The stability of the results was confirmed by a Dice index ≥80% within a range of tested parameters. The detected community was also the most informative, as it represented an optimization of the Shannon entropy. Lastly, we verified the strength of connection of the DRD2 community, which was stronger than any other randomly selected community and even more so than the Weighted Gene Co-expression Network Analysis module, commonly considered the standard approach for such studies. This finding substantiates the conclusion that the detected community represents a more connected and informative cluster of genes for the DRD2 community, and therefore better elucidates the behavior of this module of strongly related DRD2 genes. Because this gene plays a relevant role in Schizophrenia, this finding of a more specific DRD2 community will improve the understanding of the genetic factors related with this disorder.

Indexed as

Genetic Predisposition to DiseaseAlgorithmsHumansReceptors, Dopamine D2SchizophreniaDRD2 protein, humanReceptors, Dopamine D2

Identifiers

PMID29304112
PMCPMC5755767

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.