Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29304060›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Effectiveness of automatic tube potential selection with tube current modulation in coronary CT angiography for obese patients: Comparison with a body mass index-based protocol using the propensity score matching method.

Hong Seon Lee, Young Joo Suh, Kyunghwa Han, Jin Young Kim, Suyon Chang, Dong Jin Im, Yoo Jin Hong, Hye-Jeong Lee, Jin Hur, Young Jin Kim and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hong Seon LeeDepartment of Radiology, Research Institute of Radiological Science, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Korea.
Young Joo SuhDepartment of Radiology, Research Institute of Radiological Science, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-2078-5832
Kyunghwa HanDepartment of Radiology, Research Institute of Radiological Science, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Korea.
Jin Young KimDepartment of Radiology, Research Institute of Radiological Science, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Korea.
Suyon ChangDepartment of Radiology, Research Institute of Radiological Science, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Korea.
Dong Jin ImDepartment of Radiology, Research Institute of Radiological Science, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Korea.
Yoo Jin HongDepartment of Radiology, Research Institute of Radiological Science, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Korea.
Hye-Jeong LeeDepartment of Radiology, Research Institute of Radiological Science, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Korea.
Jin HurDepartment of Radiology, Research Institute of Radiological Science, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Korea.
Young Jin KimDepartment of Radiology, Research Institute of Radiological Science, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Korea.
Byoung Wook ChoiDepartment of Radiology, Research Institute of Radiological Science, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Korea.
Yonsei University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundReduced image quality from increased X-ray scatter and image noise can be problematic when coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) imaging is performed in obese patients. The aim of this study was to compare the image quality and radiation dose obtained using automatic tube potential selection with tube current modulation (APSCM) with those obtained using a body mass index (BMI)-based protocol for CCTA in obese patients.

methodsA total of 203 consecutive obese (BMI > 30 kg/m2) patients were retrospectively enrolled, of whom 96 underwent CCTA with APSCM and 107 underwent a BMI-based protocol. After applying the propensity score matching method, the clinical parameters, subjective and objective image quality, and radiation dose were compared between the APSCM group and the matched BMI-based group. These parameters were also compared among different tube potential subgroups.

resultsNo significant differences were observed between the APSCM group and the BMI-based group with respect to image quality or radiation dose assessment (p > 0.05). Twenty patients (21%) examined with 140 kV in the APSCM group were exposed to significantly more radiation (p < 0.05) than patients in the BMI-based group or patients in the other APSCM kV subgroups; significant improvement in image quality was not observed in the 140 kV subgroup. Patients with a high BMI and a large effective diameter tended to be examined with 140 kV (p < 0.05).

conclusionThe use of APSCM for CCTA in obese patients did not significantly reduce the radiation dose or improve image quality compared with those in the matched BMI-based group. Our data indicate that it is better to avoid using APSCM when 140 kV is automatically selected, due to increased radiation dose and lack of significant improvement in image quality.

Indexed as

Body Mass IndexAgedComputed Tomography AngiographyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedObesityRadiation Dosage

Identifiers

PMID29304060
PMCPMC5755873
OpenAlexW2781790486

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.