Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29304056›Full record

Observational studyPloS one2018

Incidence and antibiotic prescribing for clinically diagnosed urinary tract infection in older adults in UK primary care, 2004-2014.

Haroon Ahmed, Daniel Farewell, Hywel M Jones, Nick A Francis, Shantini Paranjothy, Christopher C Butler

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Current Pyuria Cutoffs Promote Inappropriate Urinary Tract Infection Diagnosis in Older Women.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Haroon AhmedDivision of Population Medicine, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-0634-8548
Daniel FarewellDivision of Population Medicine, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
Hywel M JonesDivision of Population Medicine, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
Nick A FrancisDivision of Population Medicine, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
Shantini ParanjothyDivision of Population Medicine, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
Christopher C ButlerNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.

Funding

HCRW_ NIHR-FS-2014Medical Research Council G0902108Medical Research Council MR/K006525/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Urinary tract infections (UTI) are an important cause of morbidity and antibiotic use in older adults but there are little data describing disease burden in primary care. The aim of this study was to estimate the incidence of clinically diagnosed UTI and examine associated empirical antibiotic prescribing. We conducted a retrospective observational study using linked health records from almost one million patients aged ≥65 years old, registered with 393 primary care practices in England. We estimated incidence of clinically diagnosed UTI between March 2004 and April 2014, and used multilevel logistic regression to examine trends in empiric antibiotic prescribing. Of 931,945 older adults, 196,358 (21%) had at least one clinically diagnosed UTI over the study period. In men, the incidence of clinically diagnosed UTI per 100 person-years at risk increased from 2.81 to 3.05 in those aged 65-74, 5.90 to 6.13 in those aged 75-84, and 8.08 to 10.54 in those aged 85+. In women, incidence increased from 9.03 to 10.96 in those aged 65-74, 11.35 to 14.34 in those aged 75-84, and 14.65 to 19.80 in those aged 85+. Prescribing of broad-spectrum antibiotics decreased over the study period. There were increases in the proportion of older men (from 45% to 74%) and women (from 55% to 82%) with UTI, prescribed a UTI specific antibiotic. There were also increases in the proportion of older men (42% to 69%) and women (15% to 26%) prescribed antibiotics for durations recommended by clinical guidelines. This is the first population-based study describing the burden of UTI in UK primary care. Our findings suggest a need to better understand reasons for increasing rates of clinically diagnosed UTI and consider how best to address this important clinical problem.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAnti-Bacterial AgentsDrug PrescriptionsFemaleHumansIncidenceMalePrimary Health CareRetrospective StudiesUnited KingdomUrinary Tract InfectionsAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID29304056
PMCPMC5755802

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.