Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29304047›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

16S rRNA analysis of diversity of manure microbial community in dairy farm environment.

Pramod Pandey, Colleen Chiu, Max Miao, Yi Wang, Matthew Settles, Noelia Silva Del Rio, Alejandro Castillo, Alex Souza, Richard Pereira, Richard Jeannotte

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Impact of biofertilizers from goat and sheep manure on rhizospheric microbial community of Cenchrus ciliaris.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. The removal of moisture and antibiotic resistance genes in dairy manure by microwave treatment.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Pramod PandeyDepartment of Population Health and Reproduction, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-0611-4415
Colleen ChiuDepartment of Population Health and Reproduction, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, California, United States of America.
Max MiaoDepartment of Plant Sciences, College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, University of California, Davis, California, United States of America.
Yi WangDepartment of Population Health and Reproduction, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, California, United States of America.
Matthew SettlesGenome Center Bioinformatics Core, University of California, Davis, California, United States of America.
Noelia Silva Del RioUniversity of California Cooperative Extension, Veterinary Medicine Teaching and Research Center, Tulare, California, United States of America.
Alejandro CastilloUniversity of California Cooperative Extension, Merced, California, United States of America.
Alex SouzaUniversity of California Cooperative Extension, Tulare, California, United States of America.
Richard PereiraDepartment of Population Health and Reproduction, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, California, United States of America.
Richard JeannotteDepartment of Plant Sciences, College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, University of California, Davis, California, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dairy farms generate a considerable amount of manure, which is applied in cropland as fertilizer. While the use of manure as fertilizer reduces the application of chemical fertilizers, the main concern with regards to manure application is microbial pollution. Manure is a reservoir of a broad range of microbial populations, including pathogens, which have potential to cause contamination and pose risks to public and animal health. Despite the widespread use of manure fertilizer, the change in microbial diversity of manure under various treatment processes is still not well-understood. We hypothesize that the microbial population of animal waste changes with manure handling used in a farm environment. Consequential microbial risk caused by animal manure may depend on manure handling. In this study, a reconnaissance effort for sampling dairy manure in California Central Valley followed by 16S rRNA analysis of content and diversity was undertaken to understand the microbiome of manure after various handling processes. The microbial community analysis of manure revealed that the population in liquid manure differs from that in solid manure. For instance, the bacteria of genus Sulfuriomonas were unique in liquid samples, while the bacteria of genus Thermos were observed only in solid samples. Bacteria of genus Clostridium were present in both solid and liquid samples. The population among liquid samples was comparable, as was the population among solid samples. These findings suggest that the mode of manure application (i.e., liquid versus solid) could have a potential impact on the microbiome of cropland receiving manure as fertilizers.

Indexed as

DairyingMicrobiotaAlgorithmsAnimalsCattleManureRNA, Ribosomal, 16SManureRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID29304047
PMCPMC5755784

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.