Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29304004›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2018

Effects of Fluoxetine on Hippocampal Neurogenesis and Neuroprotection in the Model of Global Cerebral Ischemia in Rats.

Marina Khodanovich, Alena Kisel, Marina Kudabaeva, Galina Chernysheva, Vera Smolyakova, Elena Krutenkova, Irina Wasserlauf, Mark Plotnikov, Vasily Yarnykh

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Neuroprotective and Anti-Inflammatory Effects ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Post-stroke Neurogenesis: Friend or Foe?Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Marina KhodanovichLaboratory of Neurobiology, Research Institute of Biology and Biophysics, Tomsk State University, 36, Lenina Ave., Tomsk 634050, Russia. kmsra08@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-1856-0674
Alena KiselLaboratory of Neurobiology, Research Institute of Biology and Biophysics, Tomsk State University, 36, Lenina Ave., Tomsk 634050, Russia. kisell.alena@gmail.com.
Marina KudabaevaLaboratory of Neurobiology, Research Institute of Biology and Biophysics, Tomsk State University, 36, Lenina Ave., Tomsk 634050, Russia.
Galina ChernyshevaE.D. Goldberg Institute of Pharmacology and Regenerative Medicine, 3, Lenina Ave., Tomsk 634028, Russia. bona2711@mail.ru.
Vera SmolyakovaE.D. Goldberg Institute of Pharmacology and Regenerative Medicine, 3, Lenina Ave., Tomsk 634028, Russia. light061265@mail.ru.
Elena KrutenkovaLaboratory of Neurobiology, Research Institute of Biology and Biophysics, Tomsk State University, 36, Lenina Ave., Tomsk 634050, Russia. len--k@yandex.ru.
Irina WasserlaufLaboratory of Neurobiology, Research Institute of Biology and Biophysics, Tomsk State University, 36, Lenina Ave., Tomsk 634050, Russia. i-2811-na@yandex.ru.
Mark PlotnikovE.D. Goldberg Institute of Pharmacology and Regenerative Medicine, 3, Lenina Ave., Tomsk 634028, Russia. mbp2001@mail.ru.
Vasily YarnykhLaboratory of Neurobiology, Research Institute of Biology and Biophysics, Tomsk State University, 36, Lenina Ave., Tomsk 634050, Russia. yarnykh@uw.edu.
National Research Tomsk State University · RUResearch Institute of Pharmacology and Regenerative Medicine named ED Goldberg · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor, fluoxetine, has recently attracted a significant interest as a neuroprotective therapeutic agent. There is substantial evidence of improved neurogenesis under fluoxetine treatment of brain ischemia in animal stroke models. We studied long-term effects of fluoxetine treatment on hippocampal neurogenesis, neuronal loss, inflammation, and functional recovery in a new model of global cerebral ischemia (GCI). Brain ischemia was induced in adult Wistar male rats by transient occlusion of three main vessels originating from the aortic arch and providing brain blood supply. Fluoxetine was injected intraperitoneally in a dose of 20 mg/kg for 10 days after surgery. To evaluate hippocampal neurogenesis at time points 10 and 30 days, 5-Bromo-2'-deoxyuridine was injected at days 8-10 after GCI. According to our results, 10-day fluoxetine injections decreased neuronal loss and inflammation, improved survival and functional recovery of animals, enhanced neurogenesis, and prevented an early pathological increase in neural stem cell recruitment in the subgranular zone (SGZ) of the hippocampus without reducing the number of mature neurons at day 30 after GCI. In summary, this study suggests that fluoxetine may provide a promising therapy in cerebral ischemia due to its neuroprotective, anti-inflammatory, and neurorestorative effect.

Indexed as

NeurogenesisAnimalsCerebral InfarctionFluoxetineHippocampusMaleNeuroprotective AgentsRatsRats, WistarFluoxetineNeuroprotective AgentsantidepressantsCA1dentate gyrusfluoxetineglobal brain ischemiahippocampusinflammationneural stem cellsneurogenesisrats

Identifiers

PMID29304004
PMCPMC5796111
OpenAlexW2783021036

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.