Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29303983›Full record

ArticleToxins2018

A Dipteran's Novel Sucker Punch: Evolution of Arthropod Atypical Venom with a Neurotoxic Component in Robber Flies (Asilidae, Diptera).

Stephan Holger Drukewitz, Nico Fuhrmann, Eivind A B Undheim, Alexander Blanke, Julien Giribaldi, Rosanna Mary, Guillaume Laconde, Sébastien Dutertre, Björn Marcus von Reumont

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Toxins, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Toxins · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Genome of venomous caterpillarProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  5. The genome sequence of the Dune Robberfly,Wellcome open research · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Stephan Holger DrukewitzInstitute for Biology, University of Leipzig, Talstr. 33, 04103 Leipzig, Germany. stephan.drukewitz@uni-leipzig.de.
Nico FuhrmannMax Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology, August-Thienemann-Str. 2, 24306 Plön, Germany. fuhrmann@evolbio.mpg.de.
Eivind A B UndheimCentre for Advanced Imaging, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia. e.undheim@uq.edu.au.
Alexander BlankeInstitute for Zoology, Biocenter, University of Cologne, Zuelpicher Str. 47b, 50674 Cologne, Germany. a.blanke@uni-koeln.de.
Julien GiribaldiInstitute for Biomolecules Max Mousseron, UMR 5247, University of Montpellier-CNRS, Place Eugène Bataillon, 34095 Montpellier CEDEX 5, France. julien.giribaldi@umontpellier.fr.ORCID 0000-0002-4273-3080
Rosanna MaryInstitute for Biomolecules Max Mousseron, UMR 5247, University of Montpellier-CNRS, Place Eugène Bataillon, 34095 Montpellier CEDEX 5, France. rosanna.mary@umontpellier.fr.
Guillaume LacondeInstitute for Biomolecules Max Mousseron, UMR 5247, University of Montpellier-CNRS, Place Eugène Bataillon, 34095 Montpellier CEDEX 5, France. guillaume.laconde@umontpellier.fr.
Sébastien DutertreInstitute for Biomolecules Max Mousseron, UMR 5247, University of Montpellier-CNRS, Place Eugène Bataillon, 34095 Montpellier CEDEX 5, France. sebastien.dutertre@umontpellier.fr.
Björn Marcus von ReumontInstitute for Biology, University of Leipzig, Talstr. 33, 04103 Leipzig, Germany. bmvr@arcor.de.
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRLeipzig University · DEMax Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology · DENatural History Museum · GBThe University of Queensland · AUUniversity of Cologne · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Predatory robber flies (Diptera, Asilidae) have been suspected to be venomous due to their ability to overpower well-defended prey. However, details of their venom composition and toxin arsenal remained unknown. Here, we provide a detailed characterization of the venom system of robber flies through the application of comparative transcriptomics, proteomics and functional morphology. Our results reveal asilid venoms to be dominated by peptides and non-enzymatic proteins, and that the majority of components in the crude venom is represented by just ten toxin families, which we have named Asilidin1-10. Contrary to what might be expected for a liquid-feeding predator, the venoms of robber flies appear to be rich in novel peptides, rather than enzymes with a putative pre-digestive role. The novelty of these peptides suggests that the robber fly venom system evolved independently from hematophagous dipterans and other pancrustaceans. Indeed, six Asilidins match no other venom proteins, while three represent known examples of peptide scaffolds convergently recruited to a toxic function. Of these, members of Asilidin1 closely resemble cysteine inhibitor knot peptides (ICK), of which neurotoxic variants occur in cone snails, assassin bugs, scorpions and spiders. Synthesis of one of these putative ICKs, U-Asilidin₁-Mar1a, followed by toxicity assays against an ecologically relevant prey model revealed that one of these likely plays a role as a neurotoxin involved in the immobilization of prey. Our results are fundamental to address these insights further and to understand processes that drive venom evolution in dipterans as well as other arthropods.

Indexed as

AnimalsArthropod ProteinsArthropod VenomsDipteraExocrine GlandsNeurotoxinsPeptidesProteomicsToxins, BiologicalTranscriptomeArthropod ProteinsArthropod VenomsNeurotoxinsPeptidesToxins, Biologicalarthropod venom evolutionAsilidaeAsilidincysteine inhibitor knot peptidefunctional morphologyneurotoxinssynchrotron micro computed tomography

Identifiers

PMID29303983
PMCPMC5793116
OpenAlexW2782778083

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.