Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29303681›Full record

ArticleHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2018

Patient experiences with influenza immunizations administered by pharmacists.

Jennifer E Isenor, Amy C Wagg, Susan K Bowles

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Leveraging the role of pharmacists in vaccine education and uptake among newcomers to Ontario.Canadian pharmacists journal : CPJ = Revue des pharmaciens du Canada : RPC · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Taking our best shot: Pharmacy's vaccination success story.Canadian pharmacists journal : CPJ = Revue des pharmaciens du Canada : RPC · 2022
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. 100 years since the 1918 influenza pandemic.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2018
    Article
  20. Opportunities for pharmacists to recommend and administer routine vaccines.Canadian pharmacists journal : CPJ = Revue des pharmaciens du Canada : RPC
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jennifer E Isenora College of Pharmacy, Faculty of Health and Faculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Canadian Center for Vaccinology , Dalhousie University, IWK Health Centre, and Nova Scotia Health Authority, Dalhousie University , Halifax , Nova Scotia , Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1648-7362
Amy C Waggb Pharmacy Association of Nova Scotia , Dartmouth , Nova Scotia , Canada.
Susan K Bowlesc Department of Pharmacy, Nova Scotia Health Authority-Central Zone, Halifax, Nova Scotia, College of Pharmacy, Faculty of Health and Faculty Medicine, Dalhousie University, Canadian Centre for Vaccinology , Dalhousie University, IWK Health Centre and Nova Scotia Health Authority , Halifax , Nova Scotia.ORCID 0000-0003-0821-3222
Dalhousie University · CANova Scotia Hospital · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Influenza vaccination is the most effective way to reduce influenza infection and related complications. Unfortunately, vaccination coverage remains suboptimal. The addition of pharmacists as immunizers may assist in improving vaccine coverage. The experiences of patients who have received influenza vaccines from pharmacists is an important consideration for jurisdictions considering the addition of pharmacists as immunizers. We describe the reported experiences of recipients of influenza vaccinations by pharmacists in the community pharmacy setting in Nova Scotia, Canada. During the 2013-2014 influenza season, a paper-based quality assurance questionnaire was provided to interested vaccine recipients to assess their previous vaccination experiences and current experience at the pharmacy. More than 6,500 vaccine recipients completed questionnaires. The majority of respondents cited convenience as a main reason for receiving the vaccine in the pharmacy, with 50% indicating the service was better in the pharmacy and another 40% that the service was as good as elsewhere. Respondents also reported a positive environment in the pharmacy (e.g., less stressful, less exposure to sick people) as well as professionalism and knowledge of the pharmacists. Areas for improvement identified included better communication around the paperwork required (e.g., consent forms) and the wait time post-vaccination. This evaluation demonstrated that people who chose to be vaccinated by community pharmacists reported positive experiences and convenience was the primary factor for selecting a pharmacy as the site for vaccination.

Indexed as

HumansImmunization ProgramsInfluenza, HumanInfluenza VaccinesNova ScotiaPharmaciesPharmacistsVaccinationInfluenza VaccinesCanadaimmunizationinfluenza vaccinationpharmaceutical servicespharmacist

Identifiers

PMID29303681
PMCPMC5861777
OpenAlexW2781498102

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.