ArticleThe British journal of radiology2018
Bayesian penalised likelihood reconstruction (Q.Clear) of
Article in The British journal of radiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed.
- Q.Clear reconstruction shortening the scanning time forEJNMMI physics · 2026Article
- Evaluation of a digital bismuth germanium oxide PET/CT system according to the Japanese brain tumor phantom test forPhysical and engineering sciences in medicine · 2025Article
- Article
- Innovations in clinical PET image reconstruction: advances in Bayesian penalized likelihood algorithm and deep learning.Annals of nuclear medicine · 2025Review
- Phantom-based investigation of block sequential regularised expectation maximisation (BSREM) reconstruction for zirconium-89 PET-CT for varied count levels.EJNMMI physics · 2025Article
- Comparative evaluation of Ordered Subset Expectation Maximization and Bayesian Penalized Likelihood algorithms for PET/CT image reconstruction in various malignancies usingFrontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Y-90 PET/MR imaging optimization with a Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction algorithm.Physical and engineering sciences in medicine · 2024Article
- β1600 Q.Clear Digital Reconstruction of [Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Tracing prostate cancer - the evolution of PET-CT applications.Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology · 2024Review
- Article
- Comparison of Image Quality and Quantification Parameters between Q.Clear and OSEM Reconstruction Methods on FDG-PET/CT Images in Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer.Journal of imaging · 2023Article
- Can Q.Clear reconstruction be used to improve [68 Ga]Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT image quality in overweight NEN patients?European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2022Article
- Assessing the impact of different penalty factors of the Bayesian reconstruction algorithm Q.Clear on in vivo low count kinetic analysis of [EJNMMI research · 2022Article
- The effect of Q.Clear reconstruction on quantification and spatial resolution of 18F-FDG PET in simultaneous PET/MR.EJNMMI physics · 2022Article
- New PET technologies - embracing progress and pushing the limits.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2021Article
- Standardisation of conventional and advanced iterative reconstruction methods for Gallium-68 multi-centre PET-CT trials.EJNMMI physics · 2021Article
- Impact of the Noise Penalty Factor on Quantification in Bayesian Penalized Likelihood (Q.Clear) Reconstructions ofDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Performance evaluation of the Q.Clear reconstruction framework versus conventional reconstruction algorithms for quantitative brain PET-MR studies.EJNMMI physics · 2021Article
- Impact of total variation regularized expectation maximization reconstruction on the image quality ofThe British journal of radiology · 2021Article
- Does the beta regularization parameter of bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction always affect the quantification accuracy and image quality of positron emission tomography computed tomography?Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objective
methods15
resultsComparing BPL to OSEM, there were significant increments in lesion SUV
conclusionBPL reconstruction of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.