Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29303000›Full record

ArticleHand (New York, N.Y.)2019

Patient Preferences and Utilization of Online Resources for Patients Treated in Hand Surgery Practices.

Allison J Rao, Christopher J Dy, Charles A Goldfarb, Mark S Cohen, Robert W Wysocki

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Hand (New York, N.Y.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Quality and Content of Internet-Based Information for Osteoporosis and Fragility Fracture Diagnoses.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. What's New in Hand and Wrist Surgery.The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Allison J Rao1 Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
Christopher J Dy2 Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, MO, USA.
Charles A Goldfarb2 Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, MO, USA.
Mark S Cohen1 Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
Robert W Wysocki1 Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Internet is a widely used resource by patients however, objective data on details such as frequency of usage and specific sites visited is lacking. We surveyed patients from hand surgery practices to describe patient preferences and utilization patterns for online resources.

methodsFrom October 2015 to June 2016, we enrolled patients presenting to 4 orthopedic hand surgeons at 2 academic institutions. Patients completed a survey, with questions related to their preference for learning about their diagnosis and Internet utilization both before and after the visit.

resultsA total of 226 patients were enrolled in the study. Forty-five percent of the patients had done online research prior to the office visit, and 81% preferred to learn about their diagnosis through verbal communication, as opposed to only 8% who listed Web site information. Fifty percent indicated that there was a greater than 50% chance or they would definitely seek additional information on the Internet after the office visit. When asked to choose from a list of Web sites to visit, the most popular Web site was WebMD. Specialty society Web sites (American Society for Surgery of the Hand and American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons) were less popular.

conclusionsThis survey-based study found that a majority of patients utilize the Internet both before and after the office visit; however, they often utilize unregulated sites for information. This information can help physicians guide patients to high-quality Web sites for information on their clinical diagnosis and treatment.

Indexed as

Consumer Health InformationInternetOrthopedicsPatient PreferenceAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOffice VisitsSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adulthand surgeryInternetonline resourcespatient educationpatient preferences

Identifiers

PMID29303000
PMCPMC6436126

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.