Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29302835›Full record

ReviewPituitary2018

How non-functioning pituitary adenomas can affect health-related quality of life: a conceptual model and literature review.

Cornelie D Andela, Daniel J Lobatto, Alberto M Pereira, Wouter R van Furth, Nienke R Biermasz

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pituitary, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The importance of personal documentation for patients living with long-term illness symptoms after pituitary surgery: A Constructivist Grounded Theory study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Implications for practice: why signposting patients to the Pituitary Foundation matters.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Cornelie D AndelaDepartment of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, and Center for Endocrine Tumors, C7-Q, Leiden University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands. c.d.andela@lumc.nl.
Daniel J LobattoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Alberto M PereiraDepartment of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, and Center for Endocrine Tumors, C7-Q, Leiden University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Wouter R van FurthDepartment of Neurosurgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Nienke R BiermaszDepartment of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, and Center for Endocrine Tumors, C7-Q, Leiden University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Leiden University Medical Center · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

After treatment for a non-functioning pituitary adenoma (NFA) health-related quality of life (HR-QoL) improves considerably. However, the literature about the normalization of HR-QoL after treatment is inconclusive. Some researchers described a persistently decreased HR-QoL compared to reference data, while others did not. Considering this variety in observed HR-QoL outcomes, the aim of the present review was to provide a literature overview of health outcomes in patients with a NFA, using a conceptual HR-QoL model. A concrete conceptualization of the health outcomes of patients with a NFA can be helpful to understand the observed variety in HR-QoL outcomes and to improve clinical care and guidance of these patients. For this conceptualization, the Wilson and Cleary model was used. This model has a biopsychosocial character and has been validated in several patient populations. In the present review, health outcomes of patients with a NFA were described at each stage of the model e.g. biological and physiological variables, symptom status, functional status, general health perceptions and overall HR-QoL. The Wilson-Cleary model elucidates that elements at each stage of the model can contribute to the impairment in HR-QoL of patients with a NFA, which explains the reported variety in the literature. Furthermore, by applying the model, potential interventions targeting these elements can be identified. While optimal biomedical treatment has always been the focus, it is clearly not sufficient for good HR-QoL in patients with a NFA. Further improvement of HR-QoL should be supported by a pituitary specific care trajectory, including psychosocial care (e.g. self-management training), to beneficially affect characteristics of the patient and the (healthcare) environment, with the utmost goal to optimize HR-QoL in patients after treatment.

Indexed as

HumansPituitary DiseasesPituitary NeoplasmsQuality of LifeHealth-related quality of lifeHR-QoLNon-functioning pituitary adenomaPatient reported outcomePituitary adenomaQoLQuality of lifeWell-beingWilson–Cleary model

Identifiers

PMID29302835
PMCPMC5849670
OpenAlexW2782330857

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.