ArticleClinical rheumatology2018
Analysis of biomarker serum levels in IVIG and infliximab refractory Kawasaki disease patients.
Article in Clinical rheumatology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Infliximab for intravenous immunoglobulin-resistant Kawasaki disease complicated with cholestatic hepatitis: a case report and discussion on coronary artery aneurysm prevention.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
- Immunophenotype of Kawasaki Disease: Insights into Pathogenesis and Treatment Response.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- The diagnostic role of AIM2 in Kawasaki disease.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2021Article
- Case Report: Inflammation and Endothelial Injury Profiling of COVID-19 Pediatric Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome (MIS-C).Frontiers in pediatrics · 2021Article
- Serum levels of selected cytokines [interleukin (IL)-17A, IL-18, IL-23] and chemokines (RANTES, IP10) in the acute phase of immunoglobulin A vasculitis in children.Rheumatology international · 2019Article
- Whole blood transcriptional profiles as a prognostic tool in complete and incomplete Kawasaki Disease.PloS one · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Infliximab (IFX) is effective for treatment of refractory Kawasaki disease (KD). However, the precise mechanisms and biomarkers for IFX efficacy are unknown. We tried to evaluate the effect and response to IFX therapy by measuring serum cytokine levels. Twenty-nine children with KD who had been resistant to two courses of high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin were enrolled and treated with IFX. Plasma samples were analyzed for cytokines before and after IFX administration. Serum levels of interleukin-6, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), interferon-gamma-induced monokine, interferon-gamma inducible protein 10 (IP-10), monocyte chemotactic protein 1, and soluble tumor necrosis factor-alpha receptor (sTNFR) 1 and 2 were significantly elevated before IFX treatment, but promptly decreased after the administration. The pre-treatment G-CSF and sTNFR1 levels in non-responders to IFX were significantly higher than in responders, who were defined as patients who defervesce (< 37.5 °C). After IFX administration, elevated cytokines declined to normal ranges in responders, but in non-responsive group, G-CSF and sTNFR1 remained elevated without failing to normal levels. IFX treatment significantly reduced the levels of serum cytokines, chemokines, and sTNFRs in refractory KD. G-CSF and sTNFR1 may be indicators predictive of poor response to IFX.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.