Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29302782›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie2018

Functional results following high tibial osteotomy: a review of the literature.

Mark Webb, Varun Dewan, David Elson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Good long-term survival and patient-reported outcomes after high tibial osteotomy for medial compartment osteoarthritis.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. [Effectiveness of double-plane high tibial osteotomy in treatment of medial compartment osteoarthritis].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2018
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mark WebbNorthern Deanery, Waterfront 4, Goldcrest Way, Newburn Riverside, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE15 8NY, UK. markwebb@nhs.net.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8979-8060
Varun DewanRoyal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, Wolverhampton Road, Heath Town, Wolverhampton, WV10 0QP, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0794-3055
David ElsonQueen Elizabeth Hospital, Gateshead, NE9 6SX, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionHigh tibial osteotomy (HTO) is an operation used to treat patients with medial compartment knee osteoarthritis. The United Kingdom Knee Osteotomy Registry (UKKOR) has been set up to gather contemporaneous data on HTO throughout the patient journey. UKKOR uses a variety of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) to gauge the surgical outcome.

aimThe aim of this review is to analyse the published literature that has used PROMs to assess the outcomes following HTO. METHODOLOGY: Two searches of the literature were performed and compiled highlighting 95 articles of interest. After screening and manual additions, 23 manuscripts were reviewed and appraised using the appropriate Critical Appraisal Skills Programme Checklist (Kai et al. in PLoS Med 4(11):1766-1775, 2007). RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: There is a variety of published literature on HTO with a varied approach to the use of PROMs. Their use has increased recently, and studies have demonstrated that they are appropriate assessment tools for monitoring outcomes following HTO. In all of the studies that compared pre-operative to post-operative PROMs, there have been significant improvements. However, the data are varied due to differing study designs which in some instances have significant limitations.

conclusionPROMs are effective ways to measure outcomes following HTO. They can also be useful in predicting outcome. The heterogeneity of the data and limitations of the study designs limit the transferability of the data. It is therefore important to analyse data from a multi-surgeon, multi-centre source that uses robust and constant pre- and post-operative PROMs.

Indexed as

AdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOsteoarthritis, KneeOsteotomyPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresTibiaYoung AdultHigh tibial osteotomyOsteoarthritisPatient-reported outcome measuresResultsReview

Identifiers

PMID29302782
PMCPMC5906498

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.