Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29302707›Full record

ReviewSocial psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology2018

Vantage sensitivity: a framework for individual differences in response to psychological intervention.

Bernadette de Villiers, Francesca Lionetti, Michael Pluess

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Experimental Testing of the Affective Consequences of Nostalgia.Psychology in Russia : state of the art · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Bernadette de VilliersDepartment of Biological and Experimental Psychology, School of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, G.E. Fogg Building, Office 2.01, Mile End Road, London, E1 4NS, UK.
Francesca LionettiDepartment of Biological and Experimental Psychology, School of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, G.E. Fogg Building, Office 2.01, Mile End Road, London, E1 4NS, UK.
Michael PluessDepartment of Biological and Experimental Psychology, School of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, G.E. Fogg Building, Office 2.01, Mile End Road, London, E1 4NS, UK. m.pluess@qmul.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5071-2047

Funding

H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions H2020 - MSCA - IF - 2015 - 704283
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePeople differ significantly in their response to psychological intervention, with some benefitting more from treatment than others. According to the recently proposed theoretical framework of vantage sensitivity, some of this variability may be due to individual differences in environmental sensitivity, the inherent ability to register, and process external stimuli. In this paper, we apply the vantage sensitivity framework to the field of psychiatry and clinical psychology, proposing that some people are more responsive to the positive effects of psychological intervention due to heightened sensitivity.

methodsAfter presenting theoretical frameworks related to environmental sensitivity, we review a selection of recent studies reporting individual differences in the positive response to psychological intervention.

resultsA growing number of studies report that some people benefit more from psychological intervention than others as a function of genetic, physiological, and psychological characteristics. These studies support the vantage sensitivity proposition that treatment response is influenced by factors associated with heightened sensitivity to environmental influences. More recently, studies have also shown that sensitivity can be measured with a short questionnaire which appears to predict the response to psychological intervention.

conclusionsVantage sensitivity is a framework with significant relevance for our understanding of widely observed heterogeneity in treatment response. It suggests that variability in response to treatment is partly influenced by people's differing capacity for environmental sensitivity, which can be measured with a short questionnaire. Application of the vantage sensitivity framework to psychiatry and clinical psychology may improve our knowledge regarding when, how, and for whom interventions work.

Indexed as

IndividualityOutcome Assessment, Health CarePsychotherapyHumansEnvironmental sensitivityInterventionPsychiatryPsychotherapyVantage sensitivity

Identifiers

PMID29302707
PMCPMC5959990

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.