ReviewInternational journal of surgery. Oncology2017
Systematic approach to musculoskeletal benign tumors.
Review in International journal of surgery. Oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Tracking temporal progression of benign bone tumors through X-ray based detection and segmentation.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Bone tumors: state-of-the-art imaging.Skeletal radiology · 2024Review
- Application of Machine Learning for Differentiating Bone Malignancy on Imaging: A Systematic Review.Cancers · 2023Review
- Stop Searching under the Streetlight! A Primer and Practical Guide to the Diagnosis of Joint Pain and Inflammation.Mediterranean journal of rheumatology · 2022Review
- Unicameral Bone Cysts: Review of Etiopathogenesis and Current Concepts in Diagnosis and Management.Indian journal of orthopaedics · 2022Review
- Imaging Review of Pediatric Benign Osteocytic Tumors and Latest Updates on Management.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Review
- Bone oxaloma-a localized manifestation of bone oxalosis.Skeletal radiology · 2020Article
- Treatment and recurrence of giant cell tumors of bone - A retrospective cohort from a developing country.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The radiologic workup of musculoskeletal tumors can be both cost-efficient and extremely helpful to the referring clinician if one proceeds in a thoughtful and logical manner. It should be remembered that plain films remain the most reliable imaging method for assessment of both biological activity and probable histologic diagnosis of an osseous lesion. Further investigations are of help to determine the extent of lesion and to help in staging. In order to do this, we have found it useful to include an assessment of 10 determinants in the description of a tumor. If these determinants are accurately described, the correct diagnosis or at least a limited differential diagnosis usually becomes obvious.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.