Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29302622›Full record

ArticleeNeurologicalSci2017

Challenges in diagnosing normal pressure hydrocephalus: Evaluation of the diagnostic guidelines.

J Andersson, M Rosell, K Kockum, L Söderström, K Laurell

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eNeurologicalSci, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06857136 (The Role of the Glymphatic System Avaluated Thourgh mr Imaging in the Diagnosis and Management of NPH), which is not on this map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06857136 completednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

The Role of the Glymphatic System Avaluated Thourgh mr Imaging in the Diagnosis and Management of NPH

TypeobservationalSponsorFondazione I.R.C.C.S. Istituto Neurologico Carlo BestaRan2021 to 2024Enrolled29ConditionsHydrocephalus, Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

J AnderssonDepartment of Pharmacology and Clinical Neuroscience, Neurology, Östersund, Umeå University, Sweden.
M RosellDepartment of Pharmacology and Clinical Neuroscience, Neurology, Östersund, Umeå University, Sweden.
K KockumDepartment of Pharmacology and Clinical Neuroscience, Neurology, Östersund, Umeå University, Sweden.
L SöderströmDepartment of Pharmacology and Clinical Neuroscience, Neurology, Östersund, Umeå University, Sweden.
K LaurellDepartment of Pharmacology and Clinical Neuroscience, Neurology, Östersund, Umeå University, Sweden.
Umeå University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the present diagnostic guidelines of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) in a sample from the general population.

methodsA total of 168 individuals (93 females, 75 males), mean age 75 years (range 66-92) with and without symptoms of iNPH underwent a CT-scan of the brain, a neurological examination with assessment of the triad symptoms, i.e. gait disturbances, memory impairment and urgency incontinence. The participants were then diagnosed as "unlikely", "possible" and "probable" iNPH according to the American-European and the Japanese guidelines, respectively. Separately, a senior consultant in neurology diagnosed each patient based on the overall clinical picture.

resultsObtaining a diagnosis of "probable iNPH" was three times more likely according to the American-European guidelines (

conclusionsConsiderable discrepancies were found when diagnosing iNPH according to two international guidelines and a neurologist, respectively. The Japanese guidelines, which include a minimum of two triad symptoms, were most concordant with the neurologist. As a step towards widely accepted, standardized diagnostic criteria, we suggest a revision of the current guidelines, preferably into one common diagnostic system.

Indexed as

Cognitive dysfunctionDiagnosisGait disordersHydrocephalusIdiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalusNeurologicNormal pressurePrevalence studies

Identifiers

PMID29302622
PMCPMC5746061
OpenAlexW2605940399

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.