Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29302477›Full record

ArticleGland surgery2017

Concordance between preoperative computed tomography angiographic mapping and intraoperative perforator selection for deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap breast reconstructions.

Vivian B Boer, Jan J van Wingerden, Carolien F Wever, Joost J Kardux, Michiel R Beets, Hester J van der Zaag-Loonen, Willem J Theuvenet

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gland surgery, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Vivian B BoerDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Gelre Hospital, Apeldoorn, the Netherlands.
Jan J van WingerdenDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Gelre Hospital, Apeldoorn, the Netherlands.
Carolien F WeverDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Gelre Hospital, Apeldoorn, the Netherlands.
Joost J KarduxDepartment of Radiology, Gelre Hospital, Apeldoorn, the Netherlands.
Michiel R BeetsDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Gelre Hospital, Apeldoorn, the Netherlands.
Hester J van der Zaag-LoonenDepartment of Epidemiology, Gelre Hospital, Apeldoorn, the Netherlands.
Willem J TheuvenetDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Gelre Hospital, Apeldoorn, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPreoperative imaging for perforator identification prior to a deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap elevation for breast reconstruction has many advantages. Currently, computed tomography (CT) angiography provides good visualization of the perforators and their course, and is thus the imaging technique of choice. The primary aim of this study was to determine the concordance between the perforators identified preoperatively and the perforators ultimately selected intraoperatively, with a standardized protocol, in a single institution. Secondly, we wanted to compare our results with those of other, similar studies and, thirdly, to identify those factors that may lead to a higher concordance.

methodsA retrospective review was undertaken of a case series of 49 consecutive patients undergoing unilateral autologous breast reconstruction with a DIEP flap at the Gelre Hospital, in the Netherlands, over a 4-year period from 2013 to 2017. The preoperative identification and selection of perforator number and location with the aid of CT angiography scanning were compared to the intraoperative findings and preference.

resultsOur study revealed a concordance of 67.3% between one or more perforators advised preoperatively by the radiologist and chosen intraoperatively by the surgeon. We identified significant differences in our protocol compared to others.

conclusionsThe study confirmed the benefit to both the patient and the surgeon when preoperative CT angiography is used. Scanning protocols may vary considerably and should thus be carefully scrutinized before future comparisons are made. Based on this study, the scanning range, method of selecting perforators and timing of image acquisition may have to be optimized for future prospective clinical trials.

Indexed as

Breastcomputed tomography angiography (CT angiography)free tissue flapsmammaplastyperforator flap

Identifiers

PMID29302477
PMCPMC5750307

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.